laurelrusswurm on identi.ca

This remote profile is registered on another site; see laurelrusswurm's original profile page on identi.ca.

1. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 17:33:49 EDT laurelrusswurm

   Remote profile options...

   • kxra
   • snapl
   @dpic I understood the point @snapl was making was that but for !CC ND NC licence, the music would be © "all rights reserved"
2. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 17:29:54 EDT laurelrusswurm

   Remote profile options...
   A question for advocates of NC-ND removal from Creative Commons: How many creators currently make their living exclusively w/ !CC free?
3. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 17:20:51 EDT laurelrusswurm

   Remote profile options...

   • kxra
   @dpic Here unjust !copyright law is the default with © "all rights reserved" subjugation enacted by my government regardless of my wishes.
4. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 16:24:07 EDT laurelrusswurm

   Remote profile options...

   • kxra
   • mlinksva
   • robmyers
   • lxoliva
   • greg
   @greg @dpic @robmyers @mlinksva @lxoliva !CC is a good workaround, but nothing less than !copyright abolition will produce perfect freedom.
5. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 16:13:01 EDT laurelrusswurm

   Remote profile options...

   • lxoliva
   @lxoliva excluding licenses that you deem unfree denies others the right to make their own choices.
6. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 15:32:50 EDT laurelrusswurm

   Remote profile options...

   • lxoliva
   @lxoliva There is more chance of achieving that if people are allowed to learn and make their own choices.
7. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 15:30:29 EDT laurelrusswurm

   Remote profile options...

   • lxoliva
   @lxoliva I see... your freedom is more important than their freedom. Personally I prefer a future where everyone's freedom is respected.
8. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 15:27:22 EDT laurelrusswurm

   Remote profile options...

   • greg
   @greg One reason for promoting !cc alternatives is preventing the possibility of netgen going to jail. Although this might hasten change…
9. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 15:24:24 EDT laurelrusswurm

   Remote profile options...

   • greg
   @greg The phrase I learned was "personal use," but whatever it's called, it is illegal here (and probably there) b/c of the !copyright lobby
10. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 14:11:28 EDT laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...

    • greg
    @greg by non commercial do you mean non-copyright-infringing filesharing?
11. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 14:03:54 EDT laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...

    • mlinksva
    @mlinksva One of my favorite musicians is @Allison_Crowe who uses variety of CC licenses ... esp when doing a cover artists are constrained
12. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 14:00:30 EDT laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...

    • kxra
    @dpic you can only fork a license if you know there is such a thing. When everyone you know uses !Copyright All Rights Reserved why bother?
13. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:59:06 EDT laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...

    • kxra
    @dpic No, anyone cannot fork a license. Though !cc is a fabulous success story most of the world has no idea. #explains bad !copyright law
14. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:57:24 EDT laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...

    • kxra
    @dpic I don't know what stats !cc is keeping, like most people I go by life experience and anecdotal evidence.
15. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:48:05 EDT laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...

    • kxra
    @dpic educating is the way to go... i thought that was what !cc *did* ... the new license selector thingy w/ free/non free stuff is great
16. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:44:30 EDT laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...

    • mjjzf
    @mjjzf Yes, and the suggestion is to remove NC and ND from that spectrum, which I believe would catastrphically harm !cc #StillTooNew
17. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:32:42 EDT laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...

    • kuro
    @kuro He eventually named what I think was a very old Canadian band (couldn't find anything abt them online)
18. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:15:57 EDT laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...

    • greg
    @greg I just heard one of the new !CC Canada lawyers interviewed & he couldn't come up with the name of a single !cc band...
19. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:12:54 EDT laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...

    • greg
    @greg Frankly, although they are not free enough, NC and ND *do* promote the commons because it allows creators to try !CC with less fear.
20. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:02:17 EDT laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...

    • cwebber
    @cwebber The point is to get creators on board. If NC and ND aren't !CC, the creators who brave them are unlikely to go further #notCC

• After
• Before