laurelrusswurm on identi.ca
This remote profile is registered on another site; see laurelrusswurm's original profile page on identi.ca.
-
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:59:20 EDT laurelrusswurm @zotz Why does the copyright lobby have so much money to change law? There is money for art, just precious little gets to the artists. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:38:17 EDT laurelrusswurm @zotz We won't *have* to change the treaties once enough creators use !CC ... there will be a tipping point just #notyet -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:36:03 EDT laurelrusswurm @douglasawh does your father publish work !CC ? I am tickled that my octogenarian composer father has released his newest CD !CC by-nc-sa -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:34:15 EDT laurelrusswurm @douglasawh I realize most artists don't make a living solely from their art, but there are some that do. They are on the !copyright poster -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:30:53 EDT laurelrusswurm @zotz And I bet @rms or somebody would quibble with "free software (popularly marketed as “open source software”)" http://ur1.ca/a1fyu -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:26:33 EDT laurelrusswurm @zotz Yes, he's right. Please go look at the !copyright page on anything @doctorow has published. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:24:51 EDT laurelrusswurm @zotz Wrong. There are creatives who do make a living solely from their art - they do so by !copyright. Ask J.K.Rowling. Ask Bono. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:17:54 EDT laurelrusswurm @dougsportazine There is documented evidence that our new !copyright law #DRM provisions were dictated by your gov't (thank you !wikileaks ) -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:14:27 EDT laurelrusswurm @zotz that is the reality NOW. Creators considering switching from © "all rights reserved" are more likely to with NC and/or ND. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:12:11 EDT laurelrusswurm @zotz It would do extraordinary harm because the rest of the world is just beginning to hear about Creative Commons. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:09:42 EDT laurelrusswurm @zotz The freedom is already denied. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:07:16 EDT laurelrusswurm @zotz ND and NC are PART of the Creative Commons suite *now* ... why don't those of you who want to change make your own fork. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:00:22 EDT laurelrusswurm @zotz They are already included in the !cc brand. You folks are advocating removing them. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 19:51:18 EDT laurelrusswurm @zotz I disagree, it is exactly the right question until there is *much* more awareness in the rest of the world. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 18:24:25 EDT laurelrusswurm Question for advocates of Creative Commons NC-ND removal: How many creators currently make their living exclusively w/ !CC free? #lazyweb -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 18:21:14 EDT laurelrusswurm @arnebab We tried (and failed) to stop !copyright law that protects #DRM even when used to to block !cc or !publicDomain !Canada -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 18:12:26 EDT laurelrusswurm @arnebab People who have thought about copyright reform for years are annoyed the rest of the world has not caught up; they want change NOW. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 18:05:14 EDT laurelrusswurm @douglasawh I don't advocate it either, but I believe very much it is must be available as a necessary first step. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 18:02:05 EDT laurelrusswurm @1111aether !C11 is still not in force http://www.ur1.ca/a1i1s -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 17:56:42 EDT laurelrusswurm @douglasawh copyright infringing p2p like BitTorrent is illegal #GoesBothWays …but making personal music copies is legal http://ur1.ca/a1i05