Conversation:
Notices
-
@greg Frankly, although they are not free enough, NC and ND *do* promote the commons because it allows creators to try !CC with less fear.
-
@laurelrusswurm !CC is a fairly wide spectrum. There is a tendency to talk about CC licensing as if homogenous.
-
@mjjzf Yes, and the suggestion is to remove NC and ND from that spectrum, which I believe would catastrphically harm !cc #StillTooNew
-
@laurelrusswurm like, with NC and ND, opponents need not embrace and extend !CC to keep their power, it's already done it to itself
-
@laurelrusswurm NC and ND promote the part of CC that's actually against the commons
-
@lxoliva +1
-
I think mixing the Free and non-Free under one banner harms CC and betrays the idea of a creative *commons*
-
and this is a big problem
-
♻ @zotz: I think mixing the Free and non-Free under one banner harms CC and betrays the idea of a creative *commons*
-
Completely agree. I find it problematic when the Free-as-in-Freedom mindset is clamped over the CC spectrum with "accepted licenses".