Notices tagged with cc, page 54
-
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:38:17 EDT 
laurelrusswurm
@zotz We won't *have* to change the treaties once enough creators use !CC ... there will be a tipping point just #notyet -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:36:03 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@douglasawh does your father publish work !CC ? I am tickled that my octogenarian composer father has released his newest CD !CC by-nc-sa -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:35:56 EDT 
zotz
we could try and change the treaties like this for instance: http://ur1.ca/0cd1w -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:30:53 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@zotz And I bet @rms or somebody would quibble with "free software (popularly marketed as “open source software”)" http://ur1.ca/a1fyu -
DJ Dougernaut (douglasawh)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:25:43 EDT 
DJ Dougernaut
If it were up to me proprietary software would be illegal. I really don't know how long copyright should be in the Internet age. Getting rid of it would certainly be an interesting experiment - one which I would certainly welcome. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:25:04 EDT
zotz
they would still hear about CC. and perhaps the Free software folks would feel better promoting the brand too. extra push. -
DJ Dougernaut (douglasawh)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:24:51 EDT
DJ Dougernaut
it's not really about what I want. Due to international treaties, best we can hope for is life + 50 on copyright front. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:23:46 EDT
zotz
fine but perhaps because they can still get the good CC buzz/vibes while not making the commitment to Freedom. separate the brands at least. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:21:05 EDT
zotz
way too much time. sign up for kompoz, go about your daily business as if you were only interested in Free works, see how much extra effort -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:16:42 EDT
zotz
the licenses are mixed brand wise. they are all CC licenses but the Free and the non-Free do not coexist well. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:15:49 EDT
zotz
nope, what percentage of creatives entirely support themselves from their creativity using any strategy? writers. actors, musicians? -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:14:27 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@zotz that is the reality NOW. Creators considering switching from © "all rights reserved" are more likely to with NC and/or ND. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:14:21 EDT
zotz
but you don't have to have the Free and non-Free licenses under the same brand. for one it would avoid these constant discussions. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:13:09 EDT
zotz
if you want to drop all of that, I will not fight you. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:12:13 EDT
zotz
because they don't belong, at a minimum, I have asked for years now that CC at least give us a FreeCC brand. no action on even that request. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:12:11 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@zotz It would do extraordinary harm because the rest of the world is just beginning to hear about Creative Commons. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:11:04 EDT
zotz
but who knows, it may come to that at some point. depends on how uncomfortable things get. the incompatible Free-copyleft silos = no good -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:09:52 EDT
zotz
because of creative commons stated influence history and its name, creative commons. nc and nd are not part of a commons. they don't belong. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:09:42 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@zotz The freedom is already denied. -
dougsportazine (dougsportazine)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:09:14 EDT 
dougsportazine
as @rms has said, copyright abolition does nothing to protect software freedom.
All Hacker Poesy content and data are available under the