vinc17 on identi.ca
This remote profile is registered on another site; see vinc17's original profile page on identi.ca.
-
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Wednesday, 10-Jul-2013 11:13:38 EDT vinc17 Got rid of libclang-common-dev 1:3.3~svn177638-1 that has silently been blocking clang upgrades for months. !Debian -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Thursday, 27-Jun-2013 08:38:04 EDT vinc17 Spent several hours to write a patch to print again to the correct printer with !Debian !CUPS - http://bugs.debian.org/711848#98 -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jun-2013 18:25:55 EDT vinc17 And let's recall that apt-listbugs doesn't take the security tag into account by default, and there's currently no good workaround. !Debian -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jun-2013 06:32:49 EDT vinc17 I can't contribute if I don't know the behavior in the first place. Now I've reported a bug about severities: http://bugs.debian.org/712736 -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jun-2013 06:28:03 EDT vinc17 It's a pity that for experimental (only) there's no way to signal that some !Debian package is completely broken. -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jun-2013 06:25:05 EDT vinc17 Note that my complaint is not about the bug itself, but on how it is handled: the fact that apt-listbugs can't do its job in the usual way. -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Jun-2013 22:41:00 EDT vinc17 Several people in mailing-lists, Debian developers (in bug reports), and this is also highly suggested by reportbug. -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Jun-2013 20:52:11 EDT vinc17 And if !Debian people knew how to write documentation, there would be fewer problems. -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Jun-2013 18:25:17 EDT vinc17 No, I didn't *before* being affected by the bug. -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Jun-2013 15:47:57 EDT vinc17 But the bug is not visible by apt-listbugs! Did all of you read what I've said??? -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Jun-2013 09:28:15 EDT vinc17 and I installed the experimental version of strace just because reportbug suggested to install it. -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Jun-2013 09:25:23 EDT vinc17 Fed up with !Debian rules. Now that's strace/experimental that's broken and developers want to hide that: http://bugs.debian.org/702309#20 -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Monday, 17-Jun-2013 11:48:26 EDT vinc17 Just the catalog. But what is the system directory? Where is the documentation? A package without documentation is useless! -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Monday, 17-Jun-2013 10:33:36 EDT vinc17 The DTD is installed locally (not clear from my bug report, but you can deduce it from the fact that xsltproc is fine). -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Monday, 17-Jun-2013 09:42:25 EDT vinc17 And that's also !Debian developers who decided that this wasn't a bug, while obviously it doesn't work. -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Monday, 17-Jun-2013 09:30:43 EDT vinc17 The problem seems to be !Debian specific. -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Monday, 17-Jun-2013 09:18:21 EDT vinc17 !Debian invents software that is broken by design! http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702225 -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Monday, 10-Jun-2013 08:21:50 EDT vinc17 And you're citing http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer.en.html#severities meaning that security bugs can be accepted in !Debian releases. -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Monday, 10-Jun-2013 08:18:49 EDT vinc17 Confidential/private data can be made accessible to other people due to this bug. And security bugs should have RC severity. !Debian -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Monday, 10-Jun-2013 07:58:05 EDT vinc17 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711848 - file printed on a wrong printer, accessible by other people. !Debian !CUPS