Notices tagged with cc, page 58
-
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:59:06 EDT laurelrusswurm
@dpic No, anyone cannot fork a license. Though !cc is a fabulous success story most of the world has no idea. #explains bad !copyright law -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:57:24 EDT laurelrusswurm
@dpic I don't know what stats !cc is keeping, like most people I go by life experience and anecdotal evidence. -
mlinksva (mlinksva)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:50:39 EDT mlinksva
@laurelrusswurm exactly. NC and ND aren't appealing or needed by the already-famous. they do muddle things for everyone else. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:48:05 EDT laurelrusswurm
@dpic educating is the way to go... i thought that was what !cc *did* ... the new license selector thingy w/ free/non free stuff is great -
kxra (kxra)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:44:51 EDT kxra
@laurelrusswurm Withdrawing support for something is not force, it's a statement. Anyone can fork a license. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:44:30 EDT laurelrusswurm
@mjjzf Yes, and the suggestion is to remove NC and ND from that spectrum, which I believe would catastrphically harm !cc #StillTooNew -
kxra (kxra)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:33:01 EDT kxra
@laurelrusswurm You're making the "gateway drug" argument and !CC itself has no statistics to support that. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:32:42 EDT laurelrusswurm
@kuro He eventually named what I think was a very old Canadian band (couldn't find anything abt them online) -
kuro (kuro)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:31:09 EDT kuro
I 've been observing that ALL the !CC lincences aren't well protected against abuse. Even wikipedia. Always forced 2 pay lawyers to stop it. -
mjjzf (mjjzf)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:28:24 EDT mjjzf
@laurelrusswurm !CC is a fairly wide spectrum. There is a tendency to talk about CC licensing as if homogenous. -
kxra (kxra)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:27:56 EDT kxra
@laurelrusswurm What if !CC started actually educating instead of relying on those misguided perceptions? -
kxra (kxra)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:27:25 EDT kxra
@laurelrusswurm Perception is what matters, and !CC currently reinforces the perceptions that validate permission culture. -
kuro (kuro)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:21:56 EDT kuro
@laurelrusswurm Not a single band? Points to the core problem: lawyers! Their concepts are useful for earning them money. Is !CC just that? -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:15:57 EDT laurelrusswurm
@greg I just heard one of the new !CC Canada lawyers interviewed & he couldn't come up with the name of a single !cc band... -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:12:54 EDT laurelrusswurm
@greg Frankly, although they are not free enough, NC and ND *do* promote the commons because it allows creators to try !CC with less fear. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 13:02:17 EDT laurelrusswurm
@cwebber The point is to get creators on board. If NC and ND aren't !CC, the creators who brave them are unlikely to go further #notCC -
cwebber (cwebber)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 12:52:45 EDT cwebber
@laurelrusswurm removing the sampling licenses helped. Besides, what about the suggestions to rename NC and ND to something not CC? -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 12:49:56 EDT laurelrusswurm
@cwebber the reason !CC has been effective is that creators can choose. How does removing creator choice help? -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 12:48:17 EDT laurelrusswurm
By removing ND and NC you remove creator choice. It might work if 90% of creative works were released under !CC but we're nowhere near that -
csolisr (csolisr)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 12:46:51 EDT csolisr
@laurelrusswurm s/TERRIBLE/TERRIFIC #regularexpressions