Terry Hancock on identi.ca
This remote profile is registered on another site; see digitante's original profile page on identi.ca.
-
Terry Hancock (digitante)'s status on Friday, 31-Aug-2012 18:59:46 EDT Terry Hancock @robmyers @laurelrusswurm Actually, that hinges on whether a photo of a work is a "mere copy" of the work or a work in itself... -
Terry Hancock (digitante)'s status on Friday, 31-Aug-2012 18:55:23 EDT Terry Hancock @zotz Excellent. I notice they're using the Elphel camera -- that's also open hardware -
Terry Hancock (digitante)'s status on Friday, 31-Aug-2012 16:43:22 EDT Terry Hancock @zotz That's not ringing any bells, sorry. -
Terry Hancock (digitante)'s status on Friday, 31-Aug-2012 12:49:04 EDT Terry Hancock @tieguy I see. Yeah, that makes some sense. Now I want to read it... -
Terry Hancock (digitante)'s status on Friday, 31-Aug-2012 12:07:23 EDT Terry Hancock @tieguy ...because the shift from employees to independent contractors challenges this (not widely regarded as good, but it is more free). -
Terry Hancock (digitante)'s status on Friday, 31-Aug-2012 12:06:20 EDT Terry Hancock @tieguy Oh right. That makes more sense. Though not 100%... -
Terry Hancock (digitante)'s status on Friday, 31-Aug-2012 03:45:06 EDT Terry Hancock @csolisr "Some say the Sun rises in the East. Some say it rises in the West. The answer is probably somewhere in the middle." ;-) -
Terry Hancock (digitante)'s status on Friday, 31-Aug-2012 02:27:10 EDT Terry Hancock @kfogel I'm confused by that. Sounds like he said that labor is always compensated properly and I don't buy it. -
Terry Hancock (digitante)'s status on Friday, 31-Aug-2012 02:25:29 EDT Terry Hancock So I have a PDF for the #Lunatics artbook now - 322 MB of it. Now offering it on the new kickstart as well - http://kck.st/RTCwZs #fb -
Terry Hancock (digitante)'s status on Wednesday, 29-Aug-2012 17:33:59 EDT Terry Hancock @zotz OK. But who needs that use case? (By-NC -> NC-ARR). I can't think of a practical example. -
Terry Hancock (digitante)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 22:24:42 EDT Terry Hancock @laurelrusswurm Opposite really -- ARR="all rights reserved". Not to be confused with ARGH! :-D -
Terry Hancock (digitante)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 22:23:13 EDT Terry Hancock @zotz The ONLY thing that !CC By-NC allows that NC+SA doesn't is derivatives under NC+ND. Who wants that? -
Terry Hancock (digitante)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 22:21:18 EDT Terry Hancock @zotz NC effectively includes SA according to CC's own analysis - "deriving for commercial use is a commercial use" -
Terry Hancock (digitante)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 22:19:57 EDT Terry Hancock @zotz I think it's okay to fold NC and NC+SA together into a single license but we should call it "NC" to avoid confusion with SA -
Terry Hancock (digitante)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 22:17:49 EDT Terry Hancock Finally I am printing the "Artbook & Writers' Guide" for #Lunatics for proofreading. Almost there! http://lunatics.tv #fb -
Terry Hancock (digitante)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:19:58 EDT Terry Hancock @laurelrusswurm NC prohibits you from doing anything "commercial" (which is a lot) with derivatives... -
Terry Hancock (digitante)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:19:14 EDT Terry Hancock @laurelrusswurm Hah. Not as much as you think. And to the extent that it really does, it's contrary to the entire purpose of CC. -
Terry Hancock (digitante)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:17:47 EDT Terry Hancock @digitante And it's highly unlikely that anyone using NC actually intends that -- that should be folded into NC. -
Terry Hancock (digitante)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:17:15 EDT Terry Hancock @laurelrusswurm NC+SA block exactly one use case of NC which is conversion to By-NC-ND (i.e. the derivative can block derivatives) -
Terry Hancock (digitante)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:13:26 EDT Terry Hancock @laurelrusswurm I don't ask artists for their financial statements. They have all released work under free !CC licenses.