Notices tagged with cc, page 48
-
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:47:58 EDT 
laurelrusswurm
@johnnynull You can help them figure out which way is better: buy their !CC products but don't buy their © stuff. That'll teach 'em -
johnnynull (johnnynull)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:47:53 EDT 
johnnynull
@laurelrusswurm This has nothing to do with what I said. I'm sorry I hopped in the thread. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:47:41 EDT 
zotz
well, yes and not as many of the words in them have meaning based on copyright law and not on english/whatever natural language you use. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:45:02 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@johnnynull Self publishing as a viable alternative is new !CC is even newer. Creators are trying things out to see what works #tofeedfamily -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:42:45 EDT
zotz
except that if teh free license is a copyleft one it is still in the bottle for those wanting to make derivatives but not play Free. -
johnnynull (johnnynull)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:42:15 EDT
johnnynull
@laurelrusswurm I'm talking about releasing NEW works non-CC, not re-licensing. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:41:16 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@johnnynull Once work is released under a free license, its awfully hard to put it back in the © bottle -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:32:36 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@digitante See, that's the crux of this argument: what the purpose of !CC is. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:29:00 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@digitante Clearly, this is not the way you choose to license your work. But all the !cc licenses are restrictive. Even !CC by -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:22:31 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@digitante but ND and NC are necessary if people who are making a living in the !copyright world to switch to !cc -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:21:41 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@digitante lots of people release work under !cc licenses—that's great, it is the point, after all— -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:16:56 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@digitante ... my point is that !cc is non-intuitive after hundreds of years of copyright propaganda. Most believe copyright is a RIGHT. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:10:27 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@digitante Are all these creators making their living from free !CC ? -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:07:43 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@digitante what is difficult about !cc licenses to the noob is the idea that there can be anything besides copyright. New ideas take time. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:05:23 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@digitante I have never before read of SA confusion of SA. Still, compared to copyright law, !cc licenses are crystal clear. -
johnnynull (johnnynull)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:02:56 EDT
johnnynull
@zotz @laurelrusswurm @csolisr That's more my issue. A lot of authors use CC to promote and then jump ship. Disingenuous, if you ask me. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 19:55:38 EDT
zotz
I know a lot of artists who have done Free CC works, don't know who are committed to all Free though. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 19:11:52 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@arnebab As I find material online, I post links to my !CC page http://ur1.ca/3bu21 and my !FreeCulture page http://ur1.ca/2dtzr -
csolisr (csolisr)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 19:11:47 EDT 
csolisr
@arnebab The problem is that @joshwoodward is in Twitter only, no Identi.ca yet. But I may set a mirror account for him someday. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 19:08:53 EDT
zotz
did you see: http://ur1.ca/a1scs yet?
All Hacker Poesy content and data are available under the