Notices tagged with cc, page 47
-
johnnynull (johnnynull)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 21:42:03 EDT johnnynull
@zotz Interesting, but I think that would destroy the license. Should be more BSD-like social pressure thing maybe? -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 21:29:47 EDT zotz
is it time for a Freedom pledge with penalties? -
ghmorales (ghmorales)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 21:28:12 EDT ghmorales
@csolisr Like Diablo Swing Orchestra -
csolisr (csolisr)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 21:22:15 EDT csolisr
@johnnynull Sad fact: there are artists that release a CC'd album and switch to copyright, or worse, start copyleft and switch to nonfree CC -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 21:20:48 EDT zotz
copyleft is an actual attempt at a judo workaround. the rest, not so much. -
lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 21:17:19 EDT lxoliva
@laurelrusswurm NC and ND restrict what you can do by yourself (freedom); SA stops you from harming others (power); BY is about truth -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 21:14:43 EDT laurelrusswurm
@zotz its a workaround -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 21:12:56 EDT zotz
only because copyright law lets them push other people around and CC lets them decide how much. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 21:10:51 EDT zotz
so long as we have copyright law, it is likely the best idea we can come up with. I am open to hearing better though. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 21:10:22 EDT laurelrusswurm
@maiki yes, !CC by-sa is what I'm leaning toward, and will try on my next novel. Sticking to 1st novel plan of by-nc-sa for 5 years then CC0 -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 21:10:06 EDT zotz
not at all. it does not restrict Freedom, it tries to ensure Freedom by not allowing Power to remove Freedom. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 21:06:26 EDT laurelrusswurm
One thing I dislike about !copyright is that it lets people push other people around. I like !CC because it gives people choice. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 21:04:40 EDT laurelrusswurm
Restrictive enough because you agree with what it restricts. Others prefer different restrictions that are closer to their comfort zones. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 21:02:36 EDT zotz
since we have copyright law w/automatic copyrights, BY and CC0 just permit greater restrictions one derivative away. Power not Freedom. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 21:01:24 EDT zotz
SA is only needs to be restrictive enough to try and stop others from restricting more. I would be cool to have SA without the BY. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:58:31 EDT laurelrusswurm
@zotz True. NC and ND are restrictive. But so is SA. And BY when you come down to it. Really, the only truly free !CC license is CC0 -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:51:31 EDT zotz
Freedom is not always free. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:50:08 EDT laurelrusswurm
@zotz the only way a recording artist can commit to all Free is to never EVER record or cover anything © all rights reserved. #bigLoss -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:49:23 EDT zotz
right, I often ponder writing up a Freedom pledge with penalties for breaking. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 20:48:09 EDT zotz
well, yes and no as many of the words in them have meaning based on copyright law and not on english/whatever natural language you use.