Notices tagged with cc, page 32
-
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:09:03 EDT 
marjoleink
@laroquod WHICH '18th-century' governments - and how is that relevant to today -
laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:06:13 EDT 
laroquod
@marjoleink Whether that monopoly is evil or good is a separate question. 18th C govts perceived it as a necessary *evil*. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:05:27 EDT
marjoleink
@laroquod provided there is a market at all - which, so far, I doubt :p. But OUR law does not grant a 'monopoly'. -
laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:03:50 EDT
laroquod
@marjoleink You dominate the market for your own previously created work — the law grants you that personal monopoly over redistribution. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:01:51 EDT
marjoleink
@laroquod again, you react to things I did not actually say -
laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:59:35 EDT
laroquod
@marjoleink I withdraw intentionally obtuse charge. Your claim that attribution makes no sense for Public Domain was just offensively wrong. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:56:46 EDT
marjoleink
@laroquod 'monopoly' may apply to the music industry etc. who do *dominate* a market but not to individual artists who dominate nothing -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:55:11 EDT
marjoleink
@laroquod it's not as though I dominate ANY market http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/monopoly -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:53:16 EDT
marjoleink
@laroquod there is author's right (in THIS country at least) which gives me the right to determine anyone can copy a work of ine -
laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:50:51 EDT
laroquod
@marjoleink There is no 'but it's my work' exception to monopoly. If you're the only one with the right to OK sales, it's a monopoly. Simple -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:49:29 EDT
marjoleink
@laroquod but I have never been obtuse, let alone 'intentionally' so, nor will I ever be if I can avoid Alzheimer's -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:48:22 EDT
marjoleink
@laroquod you have a right to your short-sighted opinions -
1g0r (1g0r)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:48:03 EDT 
1g0r
♻ @grolimur: On subway, add for conf abt !cc to be held at the #library - kick ass marketing #EPFL http://t.co/GNRFXdtR -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:47:19 EDT
marjoleink
@laroquod and since it applies only to *my* work it is not remotely a 'monopoly' -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:46:53 EDT
marjoleink
@laroquod I determine that others CAN distribute -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:45:15 EDT
marjoleink
@laroquod though the period is not as ridiculously long here as it is in the USA and as the USA is trying to impose on others. -
laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:44:59 EDT
laroquod
@marjoleink In my opinion yes you are being intentionally obtuse in order to protect what you perceive as your interests. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:44:22 EDT
marjoleink
@laroquod admittedly, I *will* need a lawyer to draft that part of my testament because it's not automatic even here... -
laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:44:05 EDT
laroquod
@marjoleink How is 'determine' less of a monopoly than 'distribute'? Not logical. Try again. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:43:08 EDT
marjoleink
Also, when I die, ALL my work will pass into the public domain, because I say so. No 50-year, 70-year or 100-year period in force.
All Hacker Poesy content and data are available under the