Notices tagged with cc, page 31
-
zotz (zotz)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:40:31 EDT 
zotz
depending on how law is written, it may or may not, but it does not necessarily have to. right? -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:40:05 EDT 
marjoleink
@zotz so do I! -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:39:32 EDT
marjoleink
@rysiek and did you notice you are the first one to bring up 'compensation'? *I* certainly did not. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:37:52 EDT
marjoleink
@rysiek defining 'market' in terms of a sole supplier is 'silly'. Of course a a sole supplier has a virtual monopoly but that is meaningless -
rysiek (rysiek)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:37:35 EDT 
rysiek
@marjoleink great. offer a better source saying they are not a monopoly. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:36:24 EDT
zotz
hope no one has a large economic interest in your work being pd. </tinfoilhat> -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:36:18 EDT
marjoleink
@rysiek Wikipedia, while being extremely useful, is never, ever, the last word. It is an encyclopedia in progress, by definition. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:34:24 EDT
zotz
it is a monopoly but just in a very narrow field. say I get the monopoly to sell red thread between 3 & 4 pm on every third friday? -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:33:10 EDT
marjoleink
@laroquod WHERE, exactly, does the Berne convention say 'it does not matter'? Anyway what you think you can see is wrong. -
rysiek (rysiek)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:30:42 EDT
rysiek
@laroquod @marjoleink Rights", we also have those in Poland, but are a different thing and have nothing to do with compensation. -
rysiek (rysiek)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:30:16 EDT
rysiek
@laroquod @marjoleink specifically, it grants the author the sole right to sell, copy, etc. his work. Of course, there are also "Authors' -
rysiek (rysiek)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:29:28 EDT
rysiek
@laroquod @marjoleink "monopoly." bit.ly/UTCAHi Sorry, debating this without asking Wikipedia is silly. Copyright *is* a form of monopoly. -
rysiek (rysiek)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:28:37 EDT
rysiek
@laroquod @marjoleink "original work exclusive rights to it, usually for a limited time." bit.ly/UTCwHm "Exclusive rights are a form of... -
rysiek (rysiek)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:27:55 EDT
rysiek
@laroquod @marjoleink let's ask Wikipedia, shall we? "Copyright is a legal concept, enacted by most governments, giving the creator of an... -
laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:27:23 EDT 
laroquod
@marjoleink The Berne Convention says it doesn't matter. Anyway I can see you are seeking opportunities to make more irrelevant distinctions -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:22:04 EDT
marjoleink
@laroquod WHICH 'early drafters'? -
laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:20:47 EDT
laroquod
@marjoleink The early drafters of copyright law disagree w/you. What's changed abt the modern context that makes it suddenly not a monopoly? -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:19:58 EDT
marjoleink
@laroquod that article is limited. For one thing, it does not mention Dutch Author's law. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:18:43 EDT
marjoleink
@laroquod sure 'monopoly' has a meaning. Just not in this context. -
laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:11:37 EDT
laroquod
@marjoleink "Early copyright privileges were called 'monopolies'." Check frequency of that word here: http://ur1.ca/aixfc
All Hacker Poesy content and data are available under the