Notices tagged with cc, page 33
-
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:42:05 EDT 
marjoleink
@laroquod NOT true. I have the right to *determine* who gets to distribute my files (or distribute them at all). -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:40:18 EDT
marjoleink
@laroquod congratulations! You're the very first person to even imply that I an 'obtuse'. -
laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:38:12 EDT 
laroquod
@marjoleink Connect. The. Dots. -
laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:37:58 EDT
laroquod
@marjoleink Same goes for monopoly. Only you have the right to distribute your files in the whole world but that is not monopoly? -
laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:37:26 EDT
laroquod
@marjoleink If attribution comes from copyright, well copyright can be bought. But you obtusely refuse to put two + two together. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:36:52 EDT
marjoleink
@laroquod You're apparently not debating with me but with an entirely imaginary person. -
laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:36:42 EDT
laroquod
@marjoleink You are just plain lying about what you said before. You refuse to follow basic logical consequences of your position. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:36:24 EDT
marjoleink
@laroquod not to mention, all of your comments on things I did not say seem to be totally beside the point. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:34:33 EDT
marjoleink
@laroquod I guess you seem as dishonest to me as I seem to you! -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:33:56 EDT
marjoleink
@laroquod while you seem to ignore what I said and refer only to what I did not say :p -
johnnynull (johnnynull)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:32:43 EDT 
johnnynull
@laroquod Bingo. -
laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:31:10 EDT
laroquod
@marjoleink Well you do not debate like an honest person: you just ignore whatever points others make that are inconvenient for you. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 13:18:55 EDT
marjoleink
...or to place their work in the public domain. It should not even be possible to sell that right. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 13:17:45 EDT
marjoleink
'copyright' is nothing but the right of the *creator* to determine what can be done with copies of their work. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 13:09:33 EDT
marjoleink
wrong. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 13:08:26 EDT
marjoleink
I also did not make 'a commentary on modern society'. I DID make a comment on terminology. There's a difference between the two. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 13:06:50 EDT
marjoleink
what on earth makes you think that I think 'attribution can be bought'??? I have neither said nor implied anything of the sort. -
laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 13:02:28 EDT
laroquod
@marjoleink The two concepts are entirely distinct and I find it a sad commentary on modern society that you think attribution can be bought -
laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 13:01:13 EDT
laroquod
@marjoleink For example, when Michael Jackson bought copyright to all Beatles songs, it would not have been correct to attribute them to him -
laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 12:57:35 EDT
laroquod
@marjoleink You have allowed the legal system to capture and own your ethics. Attribution has *nothing* to do with copyright whatsoever.
All Hacker Poesy content and data are available under the