laroquod on identi.ca

This remote profile is registered on another site; see laroquod's original profile page on identi.ca.

1. laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:56:22 EDT laroquod

   Remote profile options...

   • lxoliva
   @lxoliva Half of her arguments are in contradiction with the other half, but try telling her that and she'll deny that there are two halves.
2. laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:33:53 EDT laroquod

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink Nobody's impressed that you plan to relinquish copyright when you are dead and gone so spare us the tale of self-sacrifice.
3. laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:18:14 EDT laroquod

   Remote profile options...

   • laurelrusswurm
   • rysiek
   @rysiek Yep. Bored now.
4. laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:03:01 EDT laroquod

   Remote profile options...

   • rysiek
   • marjoleink
   @rysiek @marjoleink More links here: http://ur1.ca/aixo7 here: http://ur1.ca/aixo8
5. laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:27:23 EDT laroquod

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink The Berne Convention says it doesn't matter. Anyway I can see you are seeking opportunities to make more irrelevant distinctions
6. laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:20:47 EDT laroquod

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink The early drafters of copyright law disagree w/you. What's changed abt the modern context that makes it suddenly not a monopoly?
7. laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:11:37 EDT laroquod

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink "Early copyright privileges were called 'monopolies'." Check frequency of that word here: http://ur1.ca/aixfc
8. laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:06:13 EDT laroquod

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink Whether that monopoly is evil or good is a separate question. 18th C govts perceived it as a necessary *evil*.
9. laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:03:50 EDT laroquod

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink You dominate the market for your own previously created work — the law grants you that personal monopoly over redistribution.
10. laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:59:35 EDT laroquod

    Remote profile options...

    • marjoleink
    @marjoleink I withdraw intentionally obtuse charge. Your claim that attribution makes no sense for Public Domain was just offensively wrong.
11. laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:50:51 EDT laroquod

    Remote profile options...

    • marjoleink
    @marjoleink There is no 'but it's my work' exception to monopoly. If you're the only one with the right to OK sales, it's a monopoly. Simple
12. laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:44:59 EDT laroquod

    Remote profile options...

    • marjoleink
    @marjoleink In my opinion yes you are being intentionally obtuse in order to protect what you perceive as your interests.
13. laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:44:05 EDT laroquod

    Remote profile options...

    • marjoleink
    @marjoleink How is 'determine' less of a monopoly than 'distribute'? Not logical. Try again.
14. laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:38:12 EDT laroquod

    Remote profile options...

    • marjoleink
    @marjoleink Connect. The. Dots.
15. laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:37:58 EDT laroquod

    Remote profile options...

    • marjoleink
    @marjoleink Same goes for monopoly. Only you have the right to distribute your files in the whole world but that is not monopoly?
16. laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:37:26 EDT laroquod

    Remote profile options...

    • marjoleink
    @marjoleink If attribution comes from copyright, well copyright can be bought. But you obtusely refuse to put two + two together.
17. laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:36:42 EDT laroquod

    Remote profile options...

    • laurelrusswurm
    • marjoleink
    @marjoleink You are just plain lying about what you said before. You refuse to follow basic logical consequences of your position.
18. laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 14:31:10 EDT laroquod

    Remote profile options...

    • laurelrusswurm
    • marjoleink
    @marjoleink Well you do not debate like an honest person: you just ignore whatever points others make that are inconvenient for you.
19. laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 13:02:28 EDT laroquod

    Remote profile options...

    • marjoleink
    @marjoleink The two concepts are entirely distinct and I find it a sad commentary on modern society that you think attribution can be bought
20. laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 13:01:13 EDT laroquod

    Remote profile options...

    • marjoleink
    @marjoleink For example, when Michael Jackson bought copyright to all Beatles songs, it would not have been correct to attribute them to him

• Before