lxoliva on identi.ca

This remote profile is registered on another site; see lxoliva's original profile page on identi.ca.

1. lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:57:30 EDT lxoliva

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink and by using CC-BY you *already* allow them to profit. even PD, you're still the author, you just lose power to enforce it
2. lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:54:56 EDT lxoliva

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink “exactly”? you say “I don't want them to profit from sth”, then claim you'll do sth that enables them to profit from it!
3. lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:45:53 EDT lxoliva

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink no, I don't mean that. don't guess or distort what I write. can anyone else sell your works without your permission?
4. lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:45:04 EDT lxoliva

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink and you've just retracted your earlier attempt to disconnect the copyright monopoly from earnings/compensation/profit
5. lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:44:20 EDT lxoliva

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink FYI, by putting the works in the public domain, you're enabling them (and anyone else) to profit from it
6. lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:42:20 EDT lxoliva

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink many jurisdictions deny copyright holders the right to shorten their monopoly or otherwise fully give it up
7. lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:40:42 EDT lxoliva

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink how about the photographs you took yourself, that are the works of your authorship? my question didn't include others'
8. lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:11:01 EDT lxoliva

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink just like any monopolist can permit third parties to resell her own product
9. lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:02:47 EDT lxoliva

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink monopoly means “[only] one sells”; do you deny copyright empowers you to be the only one who sells works of your authorship?
10. lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 01:54:29 EDT lxoliva

    Remote profile options...

    • glynmoody
    @glynmoody I suppose telling these effects apart might be an interesting !FS/computing history project
11. lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Wednesday, 10-Oct-2012 13:27:59 EDT lxoliva

    Remote profile options...

    • laroquod
    @laroquod if you got such an overpriced jail, installing a !FS system on it makes you better off, but there are better alternatives
12. lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Sunday, 07-Oct-2012 07:01:15 EDT lxoliva

    Remote profile options...
    worse: the court will know the IPs of incoming requests, and law says it *must* sue copyright infringers (those who dare run it)
13. lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Sunday, 07-Oct-2012 06:58:33 EDT lxoliva

    Remote profile options...
    .br electoral court publishes software to get today's election results breaking !FS copyrights and without license => running it is illegal
14. lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Sunday, 07-Oct-2012 05:43:33 EDT lxoliva

    Remote profile options...

    • mlinksva
    • Simon Phipps
    @webmink !freesoftware means software freedom; open source software may lack essential freedoms, eg tivoized software
15. lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Tuesday, 02-Oct-2012 20:08:10 EDT lxoliva

    Remote profile options...

    • csolisr
    @csolisr IMHO, that's not fortunate; 1st step is for them to learn to recognize software that denies them freedom, and to want freedom
16. lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Tuesday, 02-Oct-2012 19:53:08 EDT lxoliva

    Remote profile options...

    • csolisr
    @csolisr it's just as dishonest as inviting others to “come share freedom!” into their own trap
17. lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Tuesday, 02-Oct-2012 19:51:27 EDT lxoliva

    Remote profile options...

    • csolisr
    @csolisr they're entitled to their views, but arguing for sth as a 1st step only while rejecting the 2nd is dishonest
18. lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Tuesday, 02-Oct-2012 19:48:12 EDT lxoliva

    Remote profile options...

    • csolisr
    @csolisr the problem is not what they choose for themselves, it's that they *promote* taking only step 1
19. lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Sunday, 30-Sep-2012 11:51:53 EDT lxoliva

    Remote profile options...

    • zotz
    @zotz my rejection of a basic premise in his reasoning doesn't stop me from understanding, acknowledging and disagreeing with consequences
20. lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Sunday, 30-Sep-2012 11:49:44 EDT lxoliva

    Remote profile options...

    • zotz
    @zotz I, for one, reject the notion that authors or editors get to decide how works they publish are [meant] to be used

• After
• Before