arnebab on identi.ca
This remote profile is registered on another site; see arnebab's original profile page on identi.ca.
-
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 10:09:38 EDT arnebab wish: tool sees <head>…<link rel="license" title="cc by-sa" href="…by-sa…">…</head> ⇒ marks site as free culture (also gpl and cc by). -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 10:06:30 EDT arnebab so now we only need tools which parse the license link to be able to see if content is free. Better would be using the HTML5 <link title=…> -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 10:05:09 EDT arnebab ah, yes, the standard way is http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Elements/link <head>…<link rel="license" href="/gpl.txt">…</head> -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 09:59:45 EDT arnebab is there a standard way to mark a website as GPL or CC-by-sa? Which is supported by tools? -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 09:57:55 EDT arnebab meta tags are dreadful for that: I can’t just add them from a CMS - or rather disable… (but I’ll remember it for my homepage) -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 08:37:34 EDT arnebab I think it would not slow down the rendering, since the ❤ or ★ can simply be added after rendering - if need be by Javascript. -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 08:35:35 EDT arnebab but having my browser notify me that the link would bring me to an unfree page if I clicked it would be nice. -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 08:34:55 EDT arnebab linking to other sites cannot be prevented without limiting free speech → that’s a step I am not willing to take. -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 08:32:45 EDT arnebab or show a green ❤ or golden ★ behind every link which goes to a free licensed page - similar to what Sone in !Freenet does. !cc -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 08:28:04 EDT arnebab something like libreJS, but for the content. -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 08:27:48 EDT arnebab A standard to define the license (I assume that exists), which gets used by FF. Maybe even for links (check target, unfree → Gray) -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 08:26:45 EDT arnebab full ack. I’d love to have a Firefox-Extension which grays out all sites which do not have a free license. -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 02:49:11 EDT arnebab @lxoliva I’m cannot negotiate with artists. I try to convince them that free culture is the better way for them, too. -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 01:50:03 EDT arnebab @zotz for me CC is a way for the artist to say “you may do this” and for the user to say “I only want to see what I can use”. -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 01:49:26 EDT arnebab @zotz The main effort for me is finding works with cc licenses at all. After that, most sites have nice selectors. -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 01:48:16 EDT arnebab @lxoliva going further would likely divide our community quite badly and keep people away who start with NC and leave it out later -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 01:47:22 EDT arnebab @lxoliva I think they are already making a nice distinction there by saying “they are the commons, but not free culture”. -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 19:45:34 EDT arnebab @zotz oh damn, am I really arguing *for* NC? … guess so. To change society, you must remember those who start with the first steps. -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 19:43:54 EDT arnebab @zotz you can’t mix licenses with *different* terms at all, except if one is a real subset of the other — which is pretty clear with #cc. -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 19:35:22 EDT arnebab @laurelrusswurm ouch :( — and yes, I would prefer having everything as GPL today, but reality is slow.