Notices tagged with lisp, page 4
-
I could be wrong though. Again, I don't know much about guile. I'd like to know more.
-
@barryfm I haven't used guile much, so I guess I can't comment heavily, but seems to be much more minimal in the "batteries included" aspect
-
@jasonriedy That's not really an answer. I have no problem with Common Lisp, but it does not meet @cwebber 's requirement of one good way.
-
@barryfm @cwebber What's right with using guile? (Common Lisp has strong conventions, btw.)
-
@cwebber What's wrong with using guile?
-
@cwebber I'm only slightly accustomized with Python, but AFAIK, that is quite truthful remark.
-
Emacs hacking is going through a kind of renaissance over the last few years, I feel.
-
However I will disagree with the author on "emacs has not fundamentally changed in the last 20 years"
-
With a solid standard library (and of course good packaging... not that python is great there presently)
-
I sometimes wish there was a lisp dialect that was more like python: there's a general convention and one good way to do almost everything.
-
The !Lisp Curse http://t.co/i2h6wuRQ by @rudolfwinestock /via @CompSciFact
-
You'd think that a book as beloved as On !Lisp and going for $177 used would get back in print.
-
And a nice long tutorial! Thanks!
-
Check out iolib. Has epoll support and epoll-like support on linux and *bsd.
-
usocket (http://ur1.ca/9uq07) is more convenient impl than sbcl's sockets (http://ur1.ca/9uq08)? Has select(), for instance. !lisp
-
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4246143 "Why !Lisp macros are cool, a !Perl perspective (2005)" - The comments on HN are also fun ;-).
-
Huh? Hate Windows but pretty sure Win95 had this. Did it disappear and reappear? http://ur1.ca/9qyd0 !lisp
-
Removing "goto" and other powerful features from a programming language is abstinence-only engineering. !q !lisp
-
Land of !lisp http://ur1.ca/5i2ft
-
Easy way to debug !python with #pdb, breakpoint and !emacs with a piece of #Lisp http://ur1.ca/9eu8t