Notices tagged with debian, page 45
-
jacobwb (jacobwb)'s status on Wednesday, 12-Jun-2013 04:02:44 EDT 
jacobwb
@usrshare Yes, ಠ = Kannada font. And it does see pretty wide spread use, as far as emoticons go. -
usrshare (usrshare)'s status on Wednesday, 12-Jun-2013 03:51:59 EDT 
usrshare
"Commonly used"? Seriously? -
jacobwb (jacobwb)'s status on Wednesday, 12-Jun-2013 03:44:28 EDT
jacobwb
I just noticed !Debian doesn't come with Kannada fonts. What other commonly used fonts doesn't Debian come with? ಠ_ಠ -
trc (trc)'s status on Tuesday, 11-Jun-2013 23:35:32 EDT 
trc
Lychee and Coffee 荔枝與咖啡 http://gobblin.se/u/trc/m/lychee-and-coffee/ almost a !Debian motif, but the pattern appears clock-wise -
dennisgut (dennisgut)'s status on Tuesday, 11-Jun-2013 09:12:40 EDT 
dennisgut
@evan kk, imho there is no advantage in using ubuntu as a server. ubuntu is more unstable tho, since it's based on a debian testing/unstable -
kaimi (kaimi)'s status on Tuesday, 11-Jun-2013 09:11:50 EDT 
kaimi
@dennisgut http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/29848059.jpg -
Evan Prodromou (evan)'s status on Tuesday, 11-Jun-2013 09:06:27 EDT 
Evan Prodromou
@dennisgut I've been using Ubuntu on my servers for about 8 years and haven't had incentive to change to another distro. -
dennisgut (dennisgut)'s status on Tuesday, 11-Jun-2013 09:02:19 EDT
dennisgut
@evan Why not !debian ? -
metztli (metztli)'s status on Tuesday, 11-Jun-2013 07:19:26 EDT 
metztli
⚡@schestowitz Billionaire wants massive tax refund http://ur1.ca/ea47g should we support him b/c he used !Debian as framework for !Ubuntu? -
odyx (odyx)'s status on Monday, 10-Jun-2013 08:29:35 EDT 
odyx
Arguing on severities doesn't increase my incentive to work on the bug, much to the contrary. For no benefit. #facepalm -
odyx (odyx)'s status on Monday, 10-Jun-2013 08:28:58 EDT
odyx
If you disagree with the severity, talk to the Release Team. If you disagree with the definition, talk to the Release Team. -
odyx (odyx)'s status on Monday, 10-Jun-2013 08:27:52 EDT
odyx
Security bugs are handled by the Security Team which (sometimes) decides to let security bugs in !Debian releases. http://deb.li/zTGE -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Monday, 10-Jun-2013 08:21:50 EDT 
vinc17
And you're citing http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer.en.html#severities meaning that security bugs can be accepted in !Debian releases. -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Monday, 10-Jun-2013 08:18:49 EDT
vinc17
Confidential/private data can be made accessible to other people due to this bug. And security bugs should have RC severity. !Debian -
odyx (odyx)'s status on Monday, 10-Jun-2013 08:04:04 EDT
odyx
1) it's not !Debian, it's me as maintainer; 2) it's not a confidentiality bug. You're also unneccessarily mixing severity with security. -
odyx (odyx)'s status on Monday, 10-Jun-2013 08:03:09 EDT
odyx
In the case of #711848, "For !Debian, confidentiality related bugs are not security problems!" is factually wrong in 2 aspects. -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Monday, 10-Jun-2013 07:58:05 EDT
vinc17
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711848 - file printed on a wrong printer, accessible by other people. !Debian !CUPS -
odyx (odyx)'s status on Monday, 10-Jun-2013 07:21:20 EDT
odyx
What bug are you referring to? -
vinc17 (vinc17)'s status on Monday, 10-Jun-2013 06:36:49 EDT
vinc17
Wow! For !Debian, confidentiality related bugs are not security problems! -
larjona (larjona)'s status on Sunday, 09-Jun-2013 19:12:52 EDT 
larjona
(I mean, I was using upstream !debian packages adding drbl.sourceforge.net to my apt sources.list) !clonezilla
All Hacker Poesy content and data are available under the 