Notices tagged with cc, page 9
-
I should also add that the due date is March 18th. Given the limited time, you should expect a masterpiece
-
I suppose I should add to this thread that Chapter 7 of the link I gave above (http://piipa.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=99&Itemid=77) is basically directly on point.
-
Texte auf der Website des Bundesjustizministeriums unter Creative Commons Lizenz CC-BY-ND http://is.gd/azERSn !CC
-
@redi44 if the author doesn't specify, then it's usually the authors name, works title & url to the source (not a lawyer so don't quote me)
-
Yep, that's what I meant :) BTW what is considered "OK" attribution? Will name and link in the corner do the job?
-
@redi44 yes, as long as you attribute the music properly, and don't modify it (if it's under ND)
-
If I have a company website with store and I want to use some !CC music on the info page what kind of license is OK? Everything except NC?
-
@csolisr @arnebab has been doing that for a while
-
@douglasawh Avoiding derivative works in non-free software or formats is mandatory for me. Soon !CC will allow 1-way compatibility with GPL.
-
@csolisr ... For your code, only release it under GPL (with the GPL art included). That should work, right?
-
@csolisr If you want to make your work easily reusable, release the art separately: once under GPL and once under CC-BY-SA...
-
releasing under the GPL defeats your purpose because no one outside of software uses it. Assuming, of course, your purpose is for people to use it and not to make a political statement. No judgment: perhaps a political statement needs to be made.
-
@douglasawh Dual-licensing defeats my purpose. People can choose not to release source under CC-By-SA, rendering the GPL useless.
-
I'm not sure you understand dual-licensing. That means you offer both. They do not need to be compatible. Hence, douches release under proprietary and copyleft licenses at same time.
-
@csolisr You mean like pictures? Maybe you'd be better off with CC or licensing it twice, CC and separately GPL. Also, are you trolling? :-)
-
@dper Of course I haven't stopped making. I just need to wait until the licensing system gets more apt, in order to *publish*.
-
@csolisr ... But that doesn't mean you can just stop developing. Perhaps pushing for more PD works would be a productive angle?
-
@csolisr non-crazy.
-
@dper 1. It's actually a multimedia project. Sources will be edited with free software, and I need to keep it so for derivative works.
-
@csolisr Interesting idea. Someone else just said that would be a good idea for creative works, it would allow for re-editing movies, say
DJ Dougernaut
kuro
cyberkiller
redi44
lxoliva
csolisr
dper
mlinksva
laurelrusswurm
All Hacker Poesy content and data are available under the