Conversation:
Notices
-
csolisr (csolisr)'s status on Monday, 04-Mar-2013 14:06:55 EST
csolisr
Using the !GPL v3+ as a license for artistic works instead of !CC By-SA - is it too crazy an idea? -
dper (dper)'s status on Monday, 04-Mar-2013 17:23:17 EST
dper
@csolisr You mean like pictures? Maybe you'd be better off with CC or licensing it twice, CC and separately GPL. Also, are you trolling? :-) DJ Dougernaut repeated this. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 04-Mar-2013 17:31:38 EST
laurelrusswurm
@csolisr Interesting idea. Someone else just said that would be a good idea for creative works, it would allow for re-editing movies, say -
csolisr (csolisr)'s status on Monday, 04-Mar-2013 17:41:59 EST
csolisr
@dper 1. It's actually a multimedia project. Sources will be edited with free software, and I need to keep it so for derivative works. -
mlinksva (mlinksva)'s status on Monday, 04-Mar-2013 18:03:24 EST
mlinksva
@csolisr non-crazy. -
dper (dper)'s status on Monday, 04-Mar-2013 18:43:39 EST
dper
@csolisr ... But that doesn't mean you can just stop developing. Perhaps pushing for more PD works would be a productive angle? -
Joshua Judson Rosen (rozzin)'s status on Monday, 04-Mar-2013 18:55:00 EST
Joshua Judson Rosen
I keep telling myself that I will not get sucked into these #unproductive conversations, but rather spend my time #producing things.... -
csolisr (csolisr)'s status on Monday, 04-Mar-2013 20:42:33 EST
csolisr
@dper Of course I haven't stopped making. I just need to wait until the licensing system gets more apt, in order to *publish*. -
DJ Dougernaut (douglasawh)'s status on Monday, 04-Mar-2013 22:04:33 EST
DJ Dougernaut
I'm not sure you understand dual-licensing. That means you offer both. They do not need to be compatible. Hence, douches release under proprietary and copyleft licenses at same time. -
csolisr (csolisr)'s status on Monday, 04-Mar-2013 22:07:49 EST
csolisr
@douglasawh Dual-licensing defeats my purpose. People can choose not to release source under CC-By-SA, rendering the GPL useless. -
DJ Dougernaut (douglasawh)'s status on Monday, 04-Mar-2013 22:19:00 EST
DJ Dougernaut
releasing under the GPL defeats your purpose because no one outside of software uses it. Assuming, of course, your purpose is for people to use it and not to make a political statement. No judgment: perhaps a political statement needs to be made. -
dper (dper)'s status on Monday, 04-Mar-2013 22:26:02 EST
dper
@csolisr If you want to make your work easily reusable, release the art separately: once under GPL and once under CC-BY-SA... -
dper (dper)'s status on Monday, 04-Mar-2013 22:27:17 EST
dper
@csolisr ... For your code, only release it under GPL (with the GPL art included). That should work, right? -
csolisr (csolisr)'s status on Monday, 04-Mar-2013 22:27:33 EST
csolisr
@douglasawh Avoiding derivative works in non-free software or formats is mandatory for me. Soon !CC will allow 1-way compatibility with GPL. -
lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Mar-2013 01:21:46 EST
lxoliva
@csolisr @arnebab has been doing that for a while -
DJ Dougernaut (douglasawh)'s status on Sunday, 10-Mar-2013 08:55:21 EDT
DJ Dougernaut
you should convince @rms to release under the GPL: http://stallman.org/guantanamero
-