Conversation:
Notices
-
I'm curious people's gut-check reaction to the statement "There is more FLOSS than open access educational material"
-
@douglasawh I'd agree with that
-
@douglasawh, the statement "There is more FLOSS than open access educational material" is a contradiction...
-
that is one of the main points of my paper, but I was trying to keep it under 140 char so people on identi.ca could see the entire post.
-
#FOSS *is* open-access educational material.
-
again "that is one of the main points of my paper, but I was trying to keep it under 140 char so people on identi.ca could see the entire post."
-
paper is response to chapter 6 of http://piipa.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=99&Itemid=77 if you are interested in knowing more
-
technically speaking, not just Chapter 6, but also an in-class presentation Professor Chon gave.
-
Oh, yes--that is interesting; I'll have to pass that along to my education posse.
-
I'd also be interested in seeing your paper, @douglasawh.
-
@douglasawh me too
-
I'm not sure whether I'll post it at law.musicmanumit.com, opensourceplayground.org or my personal blog, but I'll post it when done. I'll probably post a working draft too once I have something reasonably coherent.
-
I suppose I should add to this thread that Chapter 7 of the link I gave above (http://piipa.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=99&Itemid=77) is basically directly on point.
-
I should also add that the due date is March 18th. Given the limited time, you should expect a masterpiece
-
wow, typo fail. should *not* expect a masterpiece
-
I wanted to get people's opinion on Article II and my comment on Article II (about education and FLOSS) at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1n9EpqxYmAjieqVRrfvT8ga8TDDexbLPhyeQFNeFmQPI/edit thanks!