Notices tagged with cc, page 29
-
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:30:55 EDT 
marjoleink
@zotz in spite of that I claim the right to put my works in the PD *before* the 'protection' ends. Thanks for the reminder. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:29:31 EDT
marjoleink
@zotz true. Provided the author is actually known, which in the case of PD is not necessarily the case. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:28:39 EDT
marjoleink
@rysiek I ddi look at ALL sources provided in this thread. Precious few referring to 'Author's rights' that is. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:27:36 EDT 
zotz
the instance when a work protected by copyright or patent passes out out of that protection does not alter the fact of who made the work. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:26:49 EDT
marjoleink
@rysiek you are wrong in assuming I did not do what you suggest -
rysiek (rysiek)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:26:32 EDT 
rysiek
@marjoleink you were even supplied with several sources. your choice to use them or not. now I bid you farewell on this topic until you do. -
rysiek (rysiek)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:25:39 EDT
rysiek
@marjoleink I would suggest you to do some reading; find a definition of monopoly; find a definition of copyright; connect the dots. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:23:53 EDT
marjoleink
:) no feet, let alone stomping involved. That's all exclusively in your imagination. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:23:16 EDT
zotz
and that addresses the point how exactly? -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:22:58 EDT
marjoleink
@lxoliva so what? -
johnnynull (johnnynull)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:20:30 EDT 
johnnynull
@laroquod I give you credit. You held out longer than I would've. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:19:31 EDT
marjoleink
@lxoliva I deny that I am the only one who could possibly sell photographs of windows in Karakul (even if there were any buyers) -
laroquod (laroquod)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:18:14 EDT 
laroquod
@rysiek Yep. Bored now. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:16:04 EDT
marjoleink
I do NOT claim (nor ever will) a 'monopoly' in the market for photographs of windows in Karakul, even though I do claim my photos are unique -
rysiek (rysiek)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:14:29 EDT
rysiek
@marjoleink and with that I'm out of this thread, because there is just a limited amount of childish feet-stomping I can endure. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:14:24 EDT
marjoleink
@rysike the more specific, the less it is a 'monopoly'. 'Apples', yes.- Apples grown in one specific orchard, no. -
rysiek (rysiek)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:13:16 EDT
rysiek
@marjoleink ah, well, you convinced me with your well thought-through argumentation and solid sources. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:13:00 EDT
marjoleink
I conclude that both 1. and 2. are irrelevant. I make unique photographs but do not have a monopoly on such photographs. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:11:50 EDT
marjoleink
...but I do not have a monopoly in even in something as narrow as 'photographs taken on Karakul', let alone a wider category -
lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:11:01 EDT 
lxoliva
@marjoleink just like any monopolist can permit third parties to resell her own product
All Hacker Poesy content and data are available under the