Conversation:
Notices
-
#Federation issues or advantages? “Federation issues” may look like a “bug”, but they are really the result of an agreement, an implicit contract: to be part of a conversation on another node, I first have to have received the trust of someone who is taking part in it. http://status.hackerposse.com/url/7076 cc @mmn @mattl @knuthollund @aroque @simsa0 @lnxw48 @mk @robmye…
- Joshua Judson Rosen likes this.
-
A good essay! I not necessarily agree w/ all but you found an angle from which to describe (and cover) a lot.
-
As you yourself do in the last sentence of your text, I would rather use "interest" instead of "trust". #federation then becomes less this idealized way of enabling and fostering conversations that derives its "intimacy" from some mutual agreements. Rather, federation is a technical means to distribute interest. And as we can often observe, interest isn't the same as trust. Th…
-
@simsa0 I desagree with your idea that trust «isn’t there at the beginning». in «public» nodes, but not in community nodes -already the biggest part of existing instances of #gnusocial... and from my point of view its future.
-
@simsa0 I think that the key to understand why when you subscribes to someone you are showing not only "interest" but "trust" is to be conscious that the person who are subscribing to is nor just and only one more increasi…
-
@johns http://lamatriz.org/notice/22468
-
After the publication of this post we have received important inputs for this conversations. Here I would like to point out some of them: @zoowar said «Have you ever been to a dinner party with more than 6 people? It becomes difficult to have a single group conversation. We can't all speak at once, and when we do, not everyone hears us, so we break into groups. These groups are dy…
Manuel Ortega
simsa0
David de Ugarte
All Hacker Poesy content and data are available under the