Conversation:

Notices

1. MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Monday, 09-Mar-2015 15:50:22 EDT MMN-o ✅⃠

   Remote profile options...
   Regarding #GitLab moving #Gitorious data to their own servers using obscure, repeatedly failing solutions over simply rsync'ing (as they likely want to integrity check all the transferred files anyway ffs!): "<TakinOver> Their procedure just seems terribly ad-hoc. That article should scare the sh*t out of the leaders of any project or organization that is considering G…
   • MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Monday, 09-Mar-2015 16:07:02 EDT MMN-o ✅⃠

     Remote profile options...

     • pettter ✅
     I read the article. That's why I think their conclusion on rsync would still have been _far_ better than what they eventually succeeded with.
   • MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Monday, 09-Mar-2015 16:07:58 EDT MMN-o ✅⃠

     Remote profile options...
     err, their conclusion on rsync was wrong*
   • MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Monday, 09-Mar-2015 16:22:46 EDT MMN-o ✅⃠

     Remote profile options...

     • pettter ✅
     @pettter Why would there be "hours of downtime" using #rsync? They could easily do very quick per-repository downtime when doing the "final sync". No need to do all 9TB at once.
   • MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Monday, 09-Mar-2015 16:34:42 EDT MMN-o ✅⃠

     Remote profile options...
     Apparently I didn't read it close enough though, it wasn't #Gitorious data they were moving. I made an ass of myself through assuming!