Conversation:

Notices

1. LinuxWalt (@lnxw48a1) {3EB165E0-5BB1-45D2-9E7D-93B31821F864} (lnxw48a1)'s status on Tuesday, 03-Dec-2019 17:29:33 EST LinuxWalt (@lnxw48a1) {3EB165E0-5BB1-45D2-9E7D-93B31821F864}

   Remote profile options...
   Interesting that my family's political wing just learned about this. https://www.caprivacy.org/
   
   #CA Consumer Privacy Act is said to be the strongest protection in the #USA. But it still sounds like opt-out instead of opt-in.
   • LinuxWalt (@lnxw48a1) {3EB165E0-5BB1-45D2-9E7D-93B31821F864} (lnxw48a1)'s status on Tuesday, 03-Dec-2019 18:33:10 EST LinuxWalt (@lnxw48a1) {3EB165E0-5BB1-45D2-9E7D-93B31821F864}

     Remote profile options...

     • GeniusMusing
     > privacy bill would set U.S. rules, pre-empt California That's not the first time. In the very early 2000s, CA had a law protecting against telephone solicitors / robocallers. The feds passed a weaker rule that overrode it. Then CA passed a rule that gave residents notice and recourse against data breaches. The feds watered that one down, too. They should go by the same rule …