Conversation:
Notices
-
I'm wondering if a globally accessible "silence list" would be good for !gnusocial - it would: 1. Let nodes interchange silence lists ("I trust the judgement of site X to only silence those who'd be silenced here as well") 2. Make it more obvious for remote users (that aren't admins) who have trouble reaching other nodes if they are blocked of if there's just a bug. A…
-
It wouldn't be a global list. It'd be unique per instance, and each instance would manually have to add their preferred lists with silenced users. Starting a new instance would create new users, unknown to the existing lists, which would manually have to be added to any site's trusted lists before a blocking would be in effect. What I'm thinking is that if the network…
-
"any site's trusted lists" as in "any site's configured block-list", not in any other sense.
-
Every host having its own policy is a _strength_ for the network.
-
For a context to my reasoning I think only _large_ nodes would use it. Where the moderation efforts would otherwise essentially have to be duplicated. Large, public nodes would probably have very similar policies with only extremely minor differences.
-
@tuttle Yeah, a more "web of trust" rather than "ultimate trust to each single site" would be a bit more fair. But I suppose things like that would have to be left to each site's own configuration anyway ;)
MMN-o ✅⃠
All Hacker Poesy content and data are available under the