Conversation:
Notices
-
@glynmoody families preserving the legacy of creators like MLK is one of the best arguments for copyright term extension
-
Copyright is not about preserving culture, it is about encouraging its creation. Term extension destroys cultural evolution.
-
Stewardship is something that comes up in almost all copyright extension discussions. It's definitely a crowd-pleaser.
-
I just think it's a super-weak lead. I'm a mouth-foaming copyright radical and I found it unappealing.
-
It puts one of the practically sanctified families in American culture into the position of oppressor.
-
It invites the unpleasant comparison between the Civil Rights struggle of the 50s and 60s with today's Internet freedom fights.
-
And it invites a framing of clueless privileged white kids who steal from black civil rights leaders and act self-righteous about it.
-
I wasn't disagreeing with that part :-) Posting the video was not a well-considered gesture.
-
@evan, you might like to read up on how #MLK actually went about creating what he did—and why, e.g.: http://hnn.us/blogs/entries/9172.html
-
Keith Miller's `Voice of Deliverance: the Language of #MLK and Its Sources' shows well what MLK did as a case *against* copyright-expansion.
-
This is why I set aside time on #MLK day to work on !FreeCulture contributions: without a strong corpus to #reuse, the next MLK will be #SOL
-
@rozzin what’s #SOL?
-
Removing the MLK video prevents us from studying it, learning about effective speech writing, and creating more like it. !copyright == !bad
-
I think that oversimplifies. I too wish MLK's speech was freely available, but using it as a token is problematic as @evan explained.