Conversation:

Notices

1. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 17:33:49 EDT laurelrusswurm

   Remote profile options...

   • kxra
   • snapl
   @dpic I understood the point @snapl was making was that but for !CC ND NC licence, the music would be © "all rights reserved"
   • zotz (zotz)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 19:22:42 EDT zotz

     Remote profile options...

     • laurelrusswurm
     Fine, and I would ignore it just the same. Or perhaps those wanting to license NC-ND would write and brand their own license.
   • laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:07:16 EDT laurelrusswurm

     Remote profile options...

     • zotz
     @zotz ND and NC are PART of the Creative Commons suite *now* ... why don't those of you who want to change make your own fork.
   • zotz (zotz)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:09:52 EDT zotz

     Remote profile options...

     • laurelrusswurm
     because of creative commons stated influence history and its name, creative commons. nc and nd are not part of a commons. they don't belong.
   • zotz (zotz)'s status on Monday, 27-Aug-2012 20:11:04 EDT zotz

     Remote profile options...

     • laurelrusswurm
     but who knows, it may come to that at some point. depends on how uncomfortable things get. the incompatible Free-copyleft silos = no good