Conversation:

Notices

1. Douglas A. Whitfield (musicman)'s status on Wednesday, 14-Oct-2020 16:33:43 EDT Douglas A. Whitfield

   Remote profile options...
   So, um, are these referencing 14 and 15 or 1.4 and 1.5... <profiles> <profile> <id>jdk14</id> <activation> <jdk>1.4</jdk> </activation> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>bouncycastle</groupId> <artifactId>bcprov-jdk13</artifactId> <version>${bcprov.jdk13.version}</version> </dependency> </dependencies> </profile> <profile> <id>jdk15</id> <activation> <activeByDefault>true</a…
   • LinuxWalt (@lnxw48a1) {3EB165E0-5BB1-45D2-9E7D-93B31821F864} (lnxw48a1)'s status on Thursday, 15-Oct-2020 23:15:35 EDT LinuxWalt (@lnxw48a1) {3EB165E0-5BB1-45D2-9E7D-93B31821F864}

     Remote profile options...

     • Douglas A. Whitfield
     @musicman For many of the 1.x numbers, Java x and 1.x are the same.
     
     This started because after v.1.2 was released, they retroactively decided it was “Java 2”. I think v1.8 is Java 8. I don’t know what they’ve done after that.
   • Douglas A. Whitfield (musicman)'s status on Monday, 19-Oct-2020 17:49:59 EDT Douglas A. Whitfield

     Remote profile options...

     • LinuxWalt (@lnxw48a1) {3EB165E0-5BB1-45D2-9E7D-93B31821F864}
     right, but why would they be referencing Java 3? idk, the whole thing is weird.