marjoleink on identi.ca
This remote profile is registered on another site; see marjoleink's original profile page on identi.ca.
-
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:29:31 EDT marjoleink @zotz true. Provided the author is actually known, which in the case of PD is not necessarily the case. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:28:39 EDT marjoleink @rysiek I ddi look at ALL sources provided in this thread. Precious few referring to 'Author's rights' that is. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:26:49 EDT marjoleink @rysiek you are wrong in assuming I did not do what you suggest -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:23:53 EDT marjoleink :) no feet, let alone stomping involved. That's all exclusively in your imagination. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:22:58 EDT marjoleink @lxoliva so what? -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:19:31 EDT marjoleink @lxoliva I deny that I am the only one who could possibly sell photographs of windows in Karakul (even if there were any buyers) -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:16:04 EDT marjoleink I do NOT claim (nor ever will) a 'monopoly' in the market for photographs of windows in Karakul, even though I do claim my photos are unique -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:14:24 EDT marjoleink @rysike the more specific, the less it is a 'monopoly'. 'Apples', yes.- Apples grown in one specific orchard, no. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:13:00 EDT marjoleink I conclude that both 1. and 2. are irrelevant. I make unique photographs but do not have a monopoly on such photographs. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:11:50 EDT marjoleink ...but I do not have a monopoly in even in something as narrow as 'photographs taken on Karakul', let alone a wider category -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:10:41 EDT marjoleink 2. 'If entity X has monopoly in apples, the fact that I can buy oranges instead of apples does not change the fact that X has a monopoly.'.. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:10:16 EDT marjoleink @rysiek 1. is 'thesaurusally' a word? how does this apply at all to Dutch Author's right? -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:07:11 EDT marjoleink @rysiek no, ANYone I grant the right to sell my work - not just me. Even if I do want to sell my own work AS WELL. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 16:04:44 EDT marjoleink @rysiek no, it is not! -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:51:05 EDT marjoleink @rysiek no need for stomping feet, because where there is no 'market' in the true sense, 'monopoly' does not apply. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:50:18 EDT marjoleink @rysiek indeed. E.g., I have copyright to my letters to my mum & dad - but I regard that more as a matter of privacy. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:46:39 EDT marjoleink @rysiek no, that's not what copyright (as 'author's right') is about. it's about distribution. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:45:01 EDT marjoleink @rysiek 'monopoly' applies to a 'market'. What a single producer/creator has to offer is not a 'market'. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:40:42 EDT marjoleink @zotz in a very narrow field the concept of 'market' becomes essentially meaningless. -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 11-Oct-2012 15:40:05 EDT marjoleink @zotz so do I!