saul st john on betafive.net

This remote profile is registered on another site; see betafive's original profile page on betafive.net.

1. saul st john (betafive)'s status on Saturday, 02-Apr-2016 17:53:04 EDT saul st john

   Remote profile options...
   Just added support for secondary authentication by FIDO 2.0 (aka Windows Hello) to my two-factor auth plugin for !gnusocial.
   https://git.gnu.io/sstjohn/TwoFactorAuth/commit/548d75543ea785880c91e5bf5964386d982c9012
2. saul st john (betafive)'s status on Wednesday, 09-Mar-2016 17:49:00 EST saul st john

   Remote profile options...
   two-factor authentication for !gnusocial, now supporting totp and u2f
   https://git.gnu.io/sstjohn/TwoFactorAuth
3. saul st john (betafive)'s status on Friday, 04-Mar-2016 16:36:22 EST saul st john

   Remote profile options...
   just pushed an extremely alpha !gnusocial plugin implementing two-factor authentication with fido u2f hardware keys
   
   https://git.gnu.io/sstjohn/gnu-social/tree/u2f-alpha/plugins/U2F
4. saul st john (betafive)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Mar-2016 14:16:13 EST saul st john

   Remote profile options...
   is the memcache plugin broken on !gnusocial 1.2.0-beta4?
5. saul st john (betafive)'s status on Sunday, 28-Feb-2016 12:51:22 EST saul st john

   Remote profile options...

   • Michael Collins
   @cyberczar no one's talking about forcing admins to do anything-- we're talking about whether additional development to !gnusocial in order to support some admin's desire for enhanced censorship functionality is warranted and appropriate
6. saul st john (betafive)'s status on Sunday, 28-Feb-2016 12:35:45 EST saul st john

   Remote profile options...

   • Ollie
   @orobouros of course instance admins have the right to do what they like with their individual instances. should !gnusocial, though, facilitate widespread censorship?
7. saul st john (betafive)'s status on Saturday, 27-Feb-2016 21:15:58 EST saul st john

   Remote profile options...
   here's a simple dockerfile to build a !gnusocial instance with !qvitter  https://gist.github.com/sstjohn/ed5f2790991e05366b11
8. saul st john (betafive)'s status on Wednesday, 24-Feb-2016 20:12:11 EST saul st john

   Remote profile options...
   heh, now i kinda wanna draft an rfc for ethernet over !gnusocial
9. saul st john (betafive)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Feb-2016 21:00:30 EST saul st john

   Remote profile options...
   i take it !gnusocial polls are not anonymous?
10. saul st john (betafive)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Feb-2016 14:32:43 EST saul st john

    Remote profile options...

    • 竹下憲二
    • orphean
    @orphean @takeshitakenji the bridge is obviously inferior to real federation though. for example, twitter users can't remote-follow folks using !gnusocial.
11. saul st john (betafive)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Feb-2016 14:07:01 EST saul st john

    Remote profile options...

    • 竹下憲二
    • orphean
    @orphean @takeshitakenji i'm not sure i follow. do "oversized" nodes present a technical problem to the !gnusocial infrastructure, or is this more a community-building concern?
12. saul st john (betafive)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Feb-2016 13:51:00 EST saul st john

    Remote profile options...

    • orphean
    @orphean !gnusocial what's the harm, though? other servers on the network don't impact you unless you choose to interact with them.
13. saul st john (betafive)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Feb-2016 13:50:18 EST saul st john

    Remote profile options...

    • 竹下憲二
    @takeshitakenji if they could, wouldn't that be a bug in !gnusocial?
14. saul st john (betafive)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Feb-2016 13:49:25 EST saul st john

    Remote profile options...

    • 竹下憲二
    @takeshitakenji isn't the point of federation that they'd only have control over their own !gnusocial instance?
15. saul st john (betafive)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Feb-2016 13:32:14 EST saul st john

    Remote profile options...
    idea: petition the ftc to compel #twitter to federate with !gnusocial. their closed platform and opaque practices obviously constitute anticompetitve conduct.