Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) on gs.sdf.org
This remote profile is registered on another site; see laemeur's original profile page on gs.sdf.org.
-
Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) (laemeur)'s status on Saturday, 28-May-2016 03:31:17 EDT Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) !gnusocial - I'm playing with #AtomPub a bit again, and am having a little trouble with this: in the JSON representation of a post, the local conversation ID is always easily found in the "statusnet_conversation_id" property; however, in the Atom representation, that information is sometimes absent. The <status_net> element only ever contains a "notice_id" property and no conversatio… -
Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) (laemeur)'s status on Sunday, 13-Mar-2016 05:01:06 EDT Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) The development of *most* fundamental computer, communication, and aerospace science and engineering in the US was, in no small part, paid for with tax dollars in the form of Department of Defense research projects. The United States isn't a technological juggernaut BECAUSE CAPITALISM. The United States is a technological juggernaut because for a long time, the government diverted *a … -
Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) (laemeur)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Mar-2016 18:08:54 EST Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) Nicely done. Luckily, the effect only goes as far as the end of the encapsulating HTML block-level element. Maaaybe the !gnusocial group would be interested to know that funny Unicode characters in a user's display name can wreak a small degree of havoc on page rendering. I don't know if they should be filtered or not, thought. There are legitimate uses for RIGHT-TO-LEFT-OVERRIDE (U+202E) in names ...aren't there? -
Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) (laemeur)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Mar-2016 14:13:33 EST Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) Also check out the Unofficial User Manual, by @thomask , which is, IMO, the best-written user resource at the moment: https://karp.id.au/social/user/index.html -
Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) (laemeur)'s status on Saturday, 20-Feb-2016 00:20:29 EST Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) Groups are a tough nut to crack. At present, a group moderator can ban users, and they can control membership by making the group private and having to approve every member, but what I'd really love to see in !GNUsocial is the ability to do Usenet-style moderated groups, where membership is open and public, but posts to the group are queued until they've been approved by a mod. That's… -
Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) (laemeur)'s status on Tuesday, 16-Feb-2016 22:44:51 EST Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) We have notices, comments, and articles of all kinds being posted GNU social, not just just "queets", so I really think the verb "post" is best. As far as nouns go, why not just use the noun for what you're posting. Is a photo a queet? Is a comment a queet? Is a link a queet? For those of us who don't use the Qvitter interface, "queet" is irrelevant. Should every app use its own verb/… -
Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) (laemeur)'s status on Monday, 15-Feb-2016 06:26:27 EST Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) My !gnusocial conversation reconstructor can be added to your browser's search engines, so there's no need to open the page in a tab; you can just paste a post's permalink into your address bar. Instructions for Firefox & Chrome on the page: http://laemeur.sdf.org/gs/convo . Also, image attachments load now. -
Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) (laemeur)'s status on Sunday, 14-Feb-2016 04:39:21 EST Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) @tomellard @smj This has always been my problem with Facebook, Google+, &c. — it's like living in Walmart. All your friends, all your family, your professional associations, whenever you want to talk to them, they're all waiting for you in Walmart. Sure, you can go to Walmart with your friends, dressed like freaks, talking about whatever esoteric shit you're into, but.., you're st… -
Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) (laemeur)'s status on Friday, 12-Feb-2016 07:47:38 EST Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) !gnusocial — Threaded network-wide conversation reconstructor thingie I hacked together today: http://laemeur.sdf.org/gs/gs-convo-assembler.html Works okay! -
Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) (laemeur)'s status on Thursday, 11-Feb-2016 07:10:35 EST Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) Indeed. I was just wondering if it was intentional that the headers are not being sent, because it would be great to be able to grab conversation feeds via a script, but that's not possible right now.
!gnusocial -
Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) (laemeur)'s status on Thursday, 11-Feb-2016 06:53:10 EST Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) Thinking about #USENET/ !GNUsocial analogies (thanks, @smj) made me think of this: when replying to a notice that was posted to a group, if you think your reply will be of interest to the other members of the group, be sure to mention the group in your reply. The USENET analogy is this: mentioning the group is like posting a "Follow-up", and replying without mentioning is more like posting a "Reply" via email. -
Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) (laemeur)'s status on Thursday, 11-Feb-2016 06:38:41 EST Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) !gnusocial — Playing with the API and Javascript, here. Why can I do cross-origin requests to /api/statuses/show, but requests to api/statusnet/conversation fail due to the Access-Control-Allow-Origin headers not being sent? -
Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) (laemeur)'s status on Friday, 29-Jan-2016 17:07:19 EST Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) !gnusocial — I posted some Javascript via the AtomPub API and the server didn't seem to mind. The good news is that when I saw the notice on LoadAverage and the Quitters, the script tags had been stripped — I don't know if that happened when the notice was federated, or whether the UIs on those sites did it — but here on !SDF (we're running the classic UI), the code ran. That's probably not good. -
Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) (laemeur)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Jan-2016 16:21:03 EST Adam Moore (LÆMEUR) !gnusocial !snbug Weirdness in the Atom representation of a post: https://gs.sdf.org/api/statuses/show/1093.atom -- the in-reply-to information is completely wrong. The information is correct in the JSON and XML representations, though. Furthermore, I've looked at a few other replies I've sent, and the Atom information is correct. Very weird.