Simon Phipps on identi.ca
This remote profile is registered on another site; see webmink's original profile page on identi.ca.
-
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 15:56:12 EST Simon Phipps The romans used to give their children numbers as names as I recall. Very efficient. -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 15:49:55 EST Simon Phipps Using LGPL may reduce the scope to argue copyright is being infringed and thus discourage complaints from app-store-haters... 2/2 -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 15:49:22 EST Simon Phipps Using LGPL may reduce the scope to argue copyright is being infringed and thus discourage complaints from app-store-haters... -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 15:48:21 EST Simon Phipps The whole legal argument seems speculative and I believe most cases are based on conflict avoidance rather than settled law. 1/2 -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 15:46:11 EST Simon Phipps OK, looked. You assert but don't explain. Got any (written) materials? I don'f share your opinion right now. -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 15:41:51 EST Simon Phipps You're right, I didn't notice it in all the tag forest :-) Will take a look. -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 14:39:06 EST Simon Phipps Presumably it means they can put VLC into online app-stores? -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Nov-2012 18:47:00 EST Simon Phipps So you will oppose me in public when I challenge vendors who call their products open source without delivering software freedom? Awesome. -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Nov-2012 17:47:49 EST Simon Phipps <sigh /> -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Nov-2012 08:42:31 EST Simon Phipps OSI took extensive private action to deal with this abuse. Seems to be back again though, hence the question... -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Nov-2012 07:47:05 EST Simon Phipps Is there scope for the Advertising Standards Authority to act over vendors calling stuff "open source" without delivering software freedom? -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Monday, 19-Nov-2012 07:41:23 EST Simon Phipps I think you are limiting your view to COTS. Open source has already won in infrastructure, for example... -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Sunday, 18-Nov-2012 17:16:24 EST Simon Phipps Romney campaign bought managers & skimped on geeks for IT systems: wmk.me/U4SZtC -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Sunday, 18-Nov-2012 14:36:36 EST Simon Phipps OK :-) Thanks. -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Sunday, 18-Nov-2012 13:50:28 EST Simon Phipps Are you making a point or trolling? I can't decide. -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Sunday, 18-Nov-2012 12:35:26 EST Simon Phipps I agree. "Free" is the ethical construct; "Open" is the practical method; "liberty" is the shared objective. -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Sunday, 18-Nov-2012 12:18:39 EST Simon Phipps I'm not as convinced as you of the objective reality of those differences; they are the differences of adherents. -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Sunday, 18-Nov-2012 12:16:16 EST Simon Phipps Prove it. -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Sunday, 18-Nov-2012 09:02:35 EST Simon Phipps Whatever anyone may say, it can't be "open" (or indeed "free") if some uses are prohibited or require explicit permission. -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Saturday, 17-Nov-2012 20:18:35 EST Simon Phipps "Open" is never used honestly to mean "non-commercial". Only salesmen pretend otherwise.