Simon Phipps on identi.ca
This remote profile is registered on another site; see webmink's original profile page on identi.ca.
-
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 17:28:04 EST Simon Phipps That's a near certain way to ensure no-one will check your "sources". -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 17:25:17 EST Simon Phipps Surely the error in your opinion concerning app stores is that you do precisely that? -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 17:23:57 EST Simon Phipps That's precious, Bradley. -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 17:05:27 EST Simon Phipps It's a "source" but not a "reference". If you can't search or scan it, you can't refer to it... -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 17:01:52 EST Simon Phipps "Edge" as in "leading edge". It will increasingly be the norm. If we decide to abdicate responsibility we abandon software freedom there... -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 17:00:56 EST Simon Phipps I don't think that's right. That would be leveraging the retailer's contractual relationship with the customer, not creating a derived work. -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 16:59:27 EST Simon Phipps "Source" in this context as in "historical source". The Rosetta Stone is a "source" in that sense too. Still needs a transcription :-) -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 16:58:40 EST Simon Phipps I was not claiming that, just asking questions. You're the one claiming certainty & telling me to look in a rambling podcast for proof :-) -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 16:58:04 EST Simon Phipps I was not claiming that, just asking questions. You're the one claiming certainty & telling me to look in a rambling podcast for proof :-) -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 16:52:25 EST Simon Phipps Appeal to Wikipedia rules is definitely an act of desperation :-) -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 16:51:28 EST Simon Phipps Because I have a life too; you're not the only saint :-) -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 16:50:20 EST Simon Phipps The iOS case is just an edge case of a larger principle. Preventing open source being distributed on closed platforms creates a ghetto. -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 16:45:26 EST Simon Phipps So a bookstore putting a (copyrighted) book in a paper bag with text on it would be a copyright infringement? -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 16:44:42 EST Simon Phipps I don't have time to do transcription on stuff you don't consider important enough to write up. If it can't be searched it's not a source. -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 16:35:54 EST Simon Phipps BTW, your repeated comment about "doing my research" when I ask you to support your assertions seems odd. -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 16:34:34 EST Simon Phipps My doubt is that copyright applies to packaging. The GPL has to apply before it can be infringed. -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 16:24:46 EST Simon Phipps I have yet to see an informed but non-partisan account of the issue. Let me know if you find one! -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 16:23:37 EST Simon Phipps Maybe, although many have embarked on an open source future because they first used open source on a closed platform. -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 16:09:13 EST Simon Phipps If that was the only motivation I would agree. But I believe the motivation to be more visceral. -
Simon Phipps (webmink)'s status on Thursday, 22-Nov-2012 16:06:00 EST Simon Phipps I believe the issue to be one of opinion about whether post-build packaging creates a derivative. In LGPL it seems clearer that doesn't.