Notices tagged with cc, page 61
-
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Thursday, 23-Aug-2012 14:34:37 EDT 
laurelrusswurm
@zotz @marjoleink That is my point: we are far from a single definition of "copyleft" ... creators must specify what they mean re:reuse -
marjoleink (marjoleink)'s status on Thursday, 23-Aug-2012 14:24:39 EDT 
marjoleink
@zotz I would interpret that the same way - to me the 'nc' part negates the spirit of copyleft. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Thursday, 23-Aug-2012 14:03:51 EDT 
zotz
I see by context though that since others disagree, it is an unsafe assumption when using the works of others. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Thursday, 23-Aug-2012 13:58:07 EDT
zotz
I would say by-nc-sa is not copyleft. to me at least, copyleft implies Freedom. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Thursday, 23-Aug-2012 13:04:26 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@marjoleink even those who use !cc licenses don't always understand the terms they themselves have chosen (most of us are not lawyers) -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Thursday, 23-Aug-2012 12:58:34 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@marjoleink Those are definitions, not licenses... there is a world of difference between !CC by-nc-sa and !CC by-sa yet both are !copyleft -
mlinksva (mlinksva)'s status on Thursday, 23-Aug-2012 11:05:08 EDT 
mlinksva
@lxoliva tautologically. what's the relevance to thread? -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Thursday, 23-Aug-2012 10:51:03 EDT
laurelrusswurm
If @sundayers is crowd sourcing their third !CC album http://ur1.ca/a0l3t they should consider dropping the NC for a freer !copyleft license -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Thursday, 23-Aug-2012 10:33:10 EDT
laurelrusswurm
!listening to #Sundayers "Oh my cat" on !jamendo http://www.ur1.ca/a0l10 !cc by-nc-sa !selfPub #boppingalong -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Thursday, 23-Aug-2012 10:16:43 EDT
laurelrusswurm
!Jamendo is helping Spanish band Sundayers crowdsource their third album: check it out: http://ur1.ca/a0kt8 !cc by-nc-sa !SelfPub -
lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Thursday, 23-Aug-2012 07:36:32 EDT 
lxoliva
@mlinksva downloading amounts to receiving data from upstream, regardless of saving a local copy in a cache or for time shifting -
mlinksva (mlinksva)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Aug-2012 20:46:40 EDT
mlinksva
@csolisr you can consider them DRM'd if you want, but there's no evidence downloading where no UI provided for it amounts to circumvention. -
csolisr (csolisr)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Aug-2012 20:22:10 EDT 
csolisr
@jla Another example! In short, sites that use non-free Flash only and/or allow streaming without downloading, can be considered DRM'd. -
jla (jla)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Aug-2012 20:09:36 EDT 
jla
@csolisr SoundCloud allows you to forbid downloads, but !CC licences are supported. -
robmyers (robmyers)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Aug-2012 17:46:43 EDT 
robmyers
@csolisr It's easier to just not have the DRM version. There are no actual scenarios where not allowing DRM distribution is a problem. -
csolisr (csolisr)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Aug-2012 17:28:08 EDT
csolisr
@robmyers In my opinion, a readily-available DRM-free version must be an option for any !CC-licensed work. -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Aug-2012 15:11:39 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@robmyers glad to be of assistance in keeping you out of the Twilight Zone of Confusion -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Aug-2012 14:46:06 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@digitante @mlinksva I think will have to wade around these a bit to get a handle on it #IANAL -
robmyers (robmyers)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Aug-2012 14:45:57 EDT
robmyers
@laurelrusswurm :-) I think you may have saved me from any potential future conversations along those lines. :-) -
laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Aug-2012 14:44:22 EDT
laurelrusswurm
@mlinksva Hah. That's what I get for not reading the fine print. I had no idea.
All Hacker Poesy content and data are available under the