Notices tagged with cc, page 50
-
kuro (kuro)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 12:00:08 EDT 
kuro
@laurelrusswurm I support your criticising of abolishing choice of -nc and -nd in !cc 4.0 licence draft -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 11:57:32 EDT 
arnebab
so parsing meta tags could only be a start. Longterm, the software would have to parse the site to find the license deed (<a rel…) -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 11:54:34 EDT
arnebab
and as much as I dislike Facebook: it would be nice if those users had a way to label stuff as CC, too. Without support from FB. -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 11:53:17 EDT
arnebab
actually for marking, meta tags are pretty problematic, because you can’t just put them into a blog post. -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 11:51:55 EDT
arnebab
@mlinksva for example @zotz would be a fan you only get by marking your content free, so marking content gives a competitive edge -
mlinksva (mlinksva)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 11:48:43 EDT 
mlinksva
@arnebab that's a great mass curation idea. very different from publishers adding metadata. -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 11:46:39 EDT
arnebab
we could crawl the web with yacy and only add free licensed pages to the index. -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 11:46:15 EDT
arnebab
I actually think the marking in-browser - and ideally in-search-engine - would be huge: Allowing fans to find it quickly. -
mlinksva (mlinksva)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 11:23:14 EDT
mlinksva
@arnebab getting people to add metadata reliably and accurately...CC has been trying for 10 years. Uphill, tiny part of overall solution. -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 10:09:38 EDT
arnebab
wish: tool sees <head>…<link rel="license" title="cc by-sa" href="…by-sa…">…</head> ⇒ marks site as free culture (also gpl and cc by). -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 10:06:30 EDT
arnebab
so now we only need tools which parse the license link to be able to see if content is free. Better would be using the HTML5 <link title=…> -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 10:05:09 EDT
arnebab
ah, yes, the standard way is http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Elements/link <head>…<link rel="license" href="/gpl.txt">…</head> -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 09:59:45 EDT
arnebab
is there a standard way to mark a website as GPL or CC-by-sa? Which is supported by tools? -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 09:57:55 EDT
arnebab
meta tags are dreadful for that: I can’t just add them from a CMS - or rather disable… (but I’ll remember it for my homepage) -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 08:48:06 EDT 
zotz
and they are happy to keep denying it instead of trying to reverse it as best they can. (I do get your argument re baby steps though) -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 08:40:29 EDT
zotz
exactly, so you would not waste your time with the looking if you were on a search for Free at the time. -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 08:39:38 EDT
zotz
my comment was more in the direction of your browser plugin idea. not to in any way prevent linking. -
cyberkiller (cyberkiller)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 08:39:31 EDT 
cyberkiller
@arnebab there's a <meta name="copyright"...> tag http://ur1.ca/a1m37 #html -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 08:37:34 EDT
arnebab
I think it would not slow down the rendering, since the ❤ or ★ can simply be added after rendering - if need be by Javascript. -
arnebab (arnebab)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 08:35:35 EDT
arnebab
but having my browser notify me that the link would bring me to an unfree page if I clicked it would be nice.
All Hacker Poesy content and data are available under the