Notices tagged with cc, page 35
-
arder (arder)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Oct-2012 17:57:42 EDT arder help me with any Open Font similar to Calibri !gnu !fs !gimp !gimpes !scribus !inkscape !cc -
tzk (tzk)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Oct-2012 14:21:18 EDT tzk Para tener esas ideas o conceptos, hizo falta gente que trabajó y comió ¿cierto? también se necesitan recursos para generar #intangibles !cc -
demuxer (demuxer)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Oct-2012 14:20:00 EDT demuxer Stop the inclusion of proprietary licenses in !CreativeCommons 4.0: http://rod.gs/v6l !fsf !wikipedia -
trc (trc)'s status on Monday, 08-Oct-2012 16:28:54 EDT trc http://blog.webplatform.org/2012/10/one-small-step/ via @w3c http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Copyright wiki pages are !CC BY(-SA) -
agustinfontaine (agustinfontaine)'s status on Monday, 08-Oct-2012 12:14:00 EDT agustinfontaine RT @arder: Otra red Social Libre http://ur1.ca/99usu > #Libertree !gnu !fsf !fs !Parabola !Trisquel !cc -
csolisr (csolisr)'s status on Friday, 05-Oct-2012 15:02:21 EDT csolisr @jacobwb Let me get it straight: CC-BY-NC is too privative, but CC-BY-SA is too free for you. Why not simply cope up with corporative use? -
vinzv (vinzv)'s status on Friday, 05-Oct-2012 13:31:40 EDT vinzv Man kann nie genug Professor Kliq hören: http://identi.ca/url/73807405 !cc -
zotz (zotz)'s status on Friday, 05-Oct-2012 07:58:43 EDT zotz It is not permissive per se. it is more a copyleft among people. Rather than a copyleft per work, it is a copyleft per person. -
jacobwb (jacobwb)'s status on Friday, 05-Oct-2012 00:03:11 EDT jacobwb @bentinc :) -
jacobwb (jacobwb)'s status on Friday, 05-Oct-2012 00:02:59 EDT jacobwb @bentinc Haha, it'd be funny to use such a clause even if it doesn't add any additional legal protection :) -
bentinc (bentinc)'s status on Thursday, 04-Oct-2012 23:58:21 EDT bentinc @jacobwb let's just include a clause "you know who you are" ;) -
bentinc (bentinc)'s status on Thursday, 04-Oct-2012 23:55:40 EDT bentinc @jacobwb anyway, as I'm no corporation I'm looking forward to take a glance at your stuff once u decided on a licence! :) -
jacobwb (jacobwb)'s status on Thursday, 04-Oct-2012 23:54:37 EDT jacobwb @bentinc :( Yeah... Maybe this would work "This work is licensed under CC-by-SA, unless you're a corporation making millions of dollars." ;) -
jacobwb (jacobwb)'s status on Thursday, 04-Oct-2012 23:50:37 EDT jacobwb @bentinc Small businesses aren't usually corporations, correct? I don't know how it'd be implemented, it'd probably only be useful in court. -
bentinc (bentinc)'s status on Thursday, 04-Oct-2012 23:49:34 EDT bentinc @jacobwb sounds like "in a perfect world we'd..." to me. :) -
bentinc (bentinc)'s status on Thursday, 04-Oct-2012 23:48:17 EDT bentinc @jacobwb thats a difficult thing to do, philosophically as well as in (german) law. US law might differ in this regard but I doubt it. -
bentinc (bentinc)'s status on Thursday, 04-Oct-2012 23:44:41 EDT bentinc @jacobwb and how do you plan to differentiate between big business and some person who wants to create and sell her indie game? -
jacobwb (jacobwb)'s status on Thursday, 04-Oct-2012 23:42:59 EDT jacobwb @bentinc Everyone but corporations can use, sell, modify, and distribute the work without paying royalties. I think that'd be great. -
jacobwb (jacobwb)'s status on Thursday, 04-Oct-2012 23:41:30 EDT jacobwb @bentinc Yes. That's why I'd want a NC-only-for-corporations clause. -
jacobwb (jacobwb)'s status on Thursday, 04-Oct-2012 23:39:14 EDT jacobwb @bentinc Yes, but nobody wants to make a t-shirt of a wood texture, random 3D gun models or whatever. EA's trademarks would be unaffected.