Conversation:
Notices
-
On !CC #BY-SA albums/tracks !Jamendo says "Need music for commercial use? License these tracks now!" A tad misleading?
-
@freemjd Why is that misleading?
-
@freemjd yeah, I always thought that but I figure they gotta make money and from listening to @professorkliq and @tmray the Jamendo money isn't bad.
-
@kete #BY-SA (and #BY) don't require additional permission for commercial use.
-
@freemjd oh, is licensing because commercial users don't mention the author or share alike?
-
@freemjd "CC by-sa commercial use" or "non-CC commercial use"? If the latter, do by-sa artists know they've signed up for that?
-
Actually, it's because commercial users won't touch CC-BY-SA content with a ten foot pole. They'll want a traditional deal.
-
@freemjd And to make things worse, Jamendo hid the license for albums, and only shows it for individual tracks. Are they ashamed of CC?
-
Interesting. That's been my theory for ages. #SA does what most #NC licensors want & #NC prohibits much that they wouldn't object to.
-
Potentially. The fact remains #BY and #BY-SA permit commercial use. If most commercial _users_ don't want #BY or #SA, that's another matter.
-
@freemjd Not sure who would be mislead tho ... commercial devs no doubt already know what #CC means.