Conversation:

Notices

1. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Friday, 18-Jan-2013 14:48:54 EST laurelrusswurm

   Remote profile options...
   ♻ @tpb_afk The film was licensed in the best possible we could. We, of course, are not interested any anti !FreeCulture message.
   • csolisr (csolisr)'s status on Friday, 18-Jan-2013 14:57:59 EST csolisr

     Remote profile options...

     • laurelrusswurm
     @laurelrusswurm Boycott the traitors. Sorry, but I can't recommend anything else.
   • laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 19-Jan-2013 14:09:36 EST laurelrusswurm

     Remote profile options...

     • csolisr
     @csolisr If TPB did not have input/control in making/marketing of the documentary, your issue is with the filmmakers, not TPB
   • laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 19-Jan-2013 14:12:17 EST laurelrusswurm

     Remote profile options...

     • rms
     • csolisr
     @csolisr If newspaper does article on !FreeCulture, or Mike Wallace interviews @rms on #60Minutes, it doesn't make the message commercial
   • laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 19-Jan-2013 14:16:06 EST laurelrusswurm

     Remote profile options...

     • rms
     • csolisr
     @csolisr It's up to documentarian how to market own work !copyright gives creators right to control others [as @rms doesn't free his words]
   • laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 19-Jan-2013 14:21:20 EST laurelrusswurm

     Remote profile options...

     • csolisr
     @csolisr Using non !CC 0 license would be huge issue only if TPB:AFK is *not* completely independent of TPB [any control/investment/income]
   • laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 19-Jan-2013 14:23:23 EST laurelrusswurm

     Remote profile options...

     • csolisr
     @csolisr but if TPB:AFK is entirely independent documentary, it's only a little issue (didn't the filmmakers understand the *point* of TPB?)