Conversation:
Notices
-
I play stump the professor at about 1 hour 4 min: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlrPDtDNmL8&feature=youtu.be
- Joshua Judson Rosen likes this.
-
Did you guys actually find the `good guys vs. bad guys' #abstraction useful, @douglasawh?
-
And who's the wisenheimer in the back of the room who seems to have forgotten about the global recession?
-
useful in what way?
-
he's a former journalist "admirably" stuck in pre-Reagan regulationland. He actually makes a lot of sense in some ways but he doesn't have the bandwidth issue of pipes vs. spectrum figured out in any way that makes sense to me.
-
I can't say I understand the Communications Act of 1934 to really understand in full everything he has to say, but if you're curious for more, you can start here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Communications_Commission#Communications_Act_of_1934
-
`Useful in any way'—like for conceptual modeling, guess; I usually just find it #confusing to shift the topic from `good/bad acts' to `good/bad actors', but I'm not a #law geek.
-
I have no idea if others feel this way, but when talking about litigation, I feel like you have to think about actors. You can't sue/prosecute a verb. I wish I had more time to think about the distinction though.
DJ Dougernaut
Joshua Judson Rosen
All Hacker Poesy content and data are available under the