Conversation:
Notices
-
@andstatus At the present time there is no alternative which can possibly unite the free web. The only way I can see to move forward is for projects to support multiple protocols into the foreseeable future. There are some interesting developments in the works. Unlike ActivityPub, I believe that discussing any alternatives before there are solid specifications and tested imple…
- AndStatus repeated this.
-
@mike@macgirvin.com What do you this is a better alternative to #ActivityPub? Or maybe something concrete could be changed in its current version to make it better?
-
@mike@macgirvin.com What do you this is a better alternative to #ActivityPub? Or maybe something concrete could be changed in its current version to make it better?
-
@mike@macgirvin.com What do you this is a better alternative to #ActivityPub? Or maybe something concrete could be changed in its current version to make it better?
-
@mike@macgirvin.com What do you this is a better alternative to #ActivityPub? Or maybe something concrete could be changed in its current version to make it better?
-
@mike@macgirvin.com What do you this is a better alternative to #ActivityPub? Or maybe something concrete could be changed in its current version to make it better?
-
@mike@macgirvin.com What do you this is a better alternative to #ActivityPub? Or maybe something concrete could be changed in its current version to make it better?
-
@mike@macgirvin.com What do you this is a better alternative to #ActivityPub? Or maybe something concrete could be changed in its current version to make it better?
-
@mike@macgirvin.com What do you this is a better alternative to #ActivityPub? Or maybe something concrete could be changed in its current version to make it better?
-
@mike@macgirvin.com What do you this is a better alternative to #ActivityPub? Or maybe something concrete could be changed in its current version to make it better?
-
@mike@macgirvin.com What do you this is a better alternative to #ActivityPub? Or maybe something concrete could be changed in its current version to make it better?
-
@zoowar This is exactly what I propose in this #ActivityPub specification bug report: https://github.com/w3c/activitypub/issues/260
Separation of Actors (e.g. a Person) from Users of servers (user accounts) even on a conceptual (domain model level). Please support this fix!
@mike @cwebber
-
@mike@macgirvin.com I agree that #ActivityStreams2 is well designed. Maybe this is exactly because its ideas are actively tested in practice for several years in http://status.hackerposse.com/url/3385. Confusion of Actors and Users of servers in the #ActivityPub I regard as a conceptual mistake that should be fixed _now_. So I proposed concrete additions to the spec in this is…