Conversation:
Notices
-
@gargron I think you should be free to design the HTML any way you want in an atom:content[type="html"]
(I subscribe to Atom from Wordpress bloga and they're formatted with all kinds of tags. Filters take away many things like inline <img> and <video> though)
What I'm more curious about is HTML in the poco:note tag, though I don't remember the spec right now I would assume it should be text/plain in there ;)
-
@sylvhem Yes, and semantics are awesome so I believe it would be a good step to take. cc: @Gargron
-
@racuna Markdown works badly with lots of things. However it could be what a client accepts and then translates to HTML (which is what Atom feesa carry and all feedreaders accept and can parse).
PS. Does Markdown have a mimetype? Like text/markdown or is it still just used ad-hoc?
-
@druonysus Isn't there a CLI utility like md2html and/or html2md or something that you can filter through? .P
-
@Gargron Yeah, but portablecontacts is a different spec from Atom, hence the different namespace. 'poco:' tags can be embedded in anything where contact information can be useful (extending profile descriptions) and thus has nothing to do with Atom.
The portable-contacts.net site has fallen to domain squatters, but spec is still on Web Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20160426223008/http://portablecontacts.net:80/draft-spec.html
-
@jjatria Oh that's awesome. Finalized last year apparently. Thanks for answer a question I should've looked up the answer to myself .)