Conversation:
Notices
-
@takeshitakenji @moonman Lack of documentation in GS? Inconceivable!
-
@takeshitakenji @moonman There's a lot of things in GS that should be shared or persisted, and aren't, and a lot of things which are shared or persisted, which should not be.
-
@takeshitakenji @moonman Forgetting old GS stuff for a moment, what are YOUR requirements for your queue in this respect?
-
@takeshitakenji @moonman So they are now? Or is this preventative? If you have problems now then if you describe them I could try to help. If it's preventative I have to wonder if making them not touch claimed items isnt enough?
-
@takeshitakenji @moonman I don't really understand what the problem is, or didn't until this notice, hence the questioning.
I'd have to have a look at the code which I'll do when I'm back home, but my first inclination would be - are they sharing the connection object, maybe?
-
@takeshitakenji @moonman It would probably be easy to make it instanced if that helps but I'd have to sort out issues this will cause with the daemons
-
@moonman @takeshitakenji PID should be returned as the result of fork() or similar functions.