Conversation:
Notices
-
@takeshitakenji Agree, so one existing "Reply to all” action will be replaced with two, to avoid confusion: ”Reply to all participants" (what we actually have now) and "Reply to all mentioned users” ?!
@maiyannah @theru @vinzv @archaeme
-
@takeshitakenji Please point me to an example and describe, what you are doing and and what you expect to see.
The best way way to show me that message is to reply to it and mention me in that reply.
-
@archaeme Yes, AndStatus includes in ”Reply all” only users, who actually took part in the conversation (i.e. ignoring mentioned users). This is not a limitation: I think this is proper behavior.
@theru @vinzv @takeshitakenji
-
@takeshitakenji Do you mean an option to include into "Reply to all” all users, mentioned in all messages of the conversation?
I think a separate action "Reply to all including mentioned” would be more flexible?! (but longer context menu...)
@maiyannah @theru @vinzv @archaeme
-
@archaeme I will add the simplest check for the ”favorited something by”, but unfortunately there are other variations of the "favoriting activity”, sent by GNU Social server to a client application...
@theru @vinzv @takeshitakenji
-
@takeshitakenji Implemented in AndStatus v.31.01: one existing "Reply to all” action is replaced with two, to avoid confusion: ”Reply to all conversation participants" (what we actually had before) and "Reply to all mentioned users”.
@theru @vinzv @archaeme@gs.archaeme.tech https://loadaverage.org/attachment/3357546
-
@takeshitakenji In addition to that, in v.31.02 (now in Beta testing), as @archaeme@gs.archaeme.tech suggested, users who only favorited something in the conversation, are not included in the list, created by ”Reply to conversation participants".
@theru @vinzv
AndStatus
All Hacker Poesy content and data are available under the 