Conversation:
Notices
-
kat (kat)'s status on Friday, 21-Oct-2016 15:54:51 EDT 
kat
@zoowar @lnxw48 the best way to stand up to data requests is not to have it in the first place. - lnxw48 (Linux Walt) repeated this.
-
robek world (rw)'s status on Monday, 29-Aug-2016 16:45:36 EDT 
robek world
Delete facebook MMN-o ✅⃠ repeated this. -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 30-Aug-2016 02:50:54 EDT 
MMN-o ✅⃠
@rw Or as I have recently come to calling it: NSA+Facebook. -
lnxw48 (Linux Walt) (lnxw48)'s status on Friday, 21-Oct-2016 14:12:46 EDT 
lnxw48 (Linux Walt)
@zoowar Protected from surveillance by whims of site admins' policies is true of every site, subject to the depth of the stack that site's admins actually control and the admins' skill. One is likely no worse off because they use GS instead of FB. @mmn -
lnxw48 (Linux Walt) (lnxw48)'s status on Friday, 21-Oct-2016 14:21:02 EDT
lnxw48 (Linux Walt)
Actually, based on the breadth and depth of the info FB collects and the number of sites using its data-collection tools, GS users' data is more at risk from FB than from their GS site. -
lnxw48 (Linux Walt) (lnxw48)'s status on Friday, 21-Oct-2016 14:31:49 EDT
lnxw48 (Linux Walt)
@zoowar True, content is public, but not more important info about you such as the various IP addresses you connect from or your IDcard info or the near complete list of sites you visit. -
lnxw48 (Linux Walt) (lnxw48)'s status on Friday, 21-Oct-2016 14:48:08 EDT
lnxw48 (Linux Walt)
@zoowar FOAF is just a contact list, which used to be public on FB, too. Has that changed? -
lnxw48 (Linux Walt) (lnxw48)'s status on Friday, 21-Oct-2016 17:20:18 EDT
lnxw48 (Linux Walt)
@kat I agree fully.
All Hacker Poesy content and data are available under the