Notices tagged with libreplanet, page 44
-
ossguy (ossguy)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Mar-2013 12:18:00 EDT 
ossguy
@mlinksva Also excited for #MozillaPersona; was at @fmarier's #LibrePlanet talk. But default persona.org assertion tester/fallback worrying. -
gatoso (gatoso)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Mar-2013 23:21:45 EDT 
gatoso
Promueve Cuba uso de software libre para garantizar soberanía tecnológica ur1.ca/d6n64 !FSF !GNU !libreplanet -
gatoso (gatoso)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Mar-2013 23:14:08 EDT
gatoso
Ley de Software Libre y Formatos Abiertos en Uruguay ur1.ca/d6n3f !FSF !GNU !libreplanet -
thelastproject (thelastproject)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Mar-2013 19:26:25 EDT 
thelastproject
They were mostly CC-BY-SA for quite a while. There was one part which had a clause which looked somewhat like NC but that's resolved now. -
4rtopal (4rtopal)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Mar-2013 18:03:15 EDT 
4rtopal
.. #BittorrentLive -
gabrielsaldana (gabrielsaldana)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Mar-2013 16:11:27 EDT 
gabrielsaldana
@johns thanks, I'll keep an eye out for when they are ready -
gabrielsaldana (gabrielsaldana)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Mar-2013 15:59:57 EDT
gabrielsaldana
are the !libreplanet talk videos up yet? -
engelnyst (engelnyst)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Mar-2013 10:45:48 EDT 
engelnyst
I thought Red Eclipse changed to mostly CC-BY-SA only recently. Maybe Debian will reconsider. -
gatoso (gatoso)'s status on Monday, 25-Mar-2013 22:26:22 EDT
gatoso
QUEMA TU MÓVIL ur1.ca/9x3hk !gnu !fsf !libreplanet !privacy -
zykotick9 (zykotick9)'s status on Monday, 25-Mar-2013 15:44:57 EDT 
zykotick9
@lxoliva intially i reacted with remove contrib and non-free. i think "you're own your own" for support, is more inline with freedom 0. -
lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Monday, 25-Mar-2013 15:44:50 EDT 
lxoliva
@zykotick9 that's conflating two dimensions: Free Software vs non-Free non-Software -
lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Monday, 25-Mar-2013 15:41:11 EDT
lxoliva
@d3f and they're maintained by Debian volunteers using Debian infrastructure. double thinking of it as not Debian doesn't solve the problem -
lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Monday, 25-Mar-2013 15:34:52 EDT
lxoliva
@zykotick9 see, that's where the difference between using (choosing only Free) and recommending (with bundled non-Free) is -
electronaut (electronaut)'s status on Monday, 25-Mar-2013 15:02:40 EDT 
electronaut
@d3f Thank you for clarifying. I appreciate that! -
zykotick9 (zykotick9)'s status on Monday, 25-Mar-2013 14:29:55 EDT
zykotick9
@thelastproject i agree. free software + free art = free society. copyleft FTW! -
zykotick9 (zykotick9)'s status on Monday, 25-Mar-2013 14:26:16 EDT
zykotick9
@cwebber if the software is free, and the art isn't - i can appreciate that (only due to RMS's view TBH). i own doom 1&2&3 ;) -
thelastproject (thelastproject)'s status on Monday, 25-Mar-2013 14:24:12 EDT
thelastproject
Game art should at least be redistributable imho. If you can't redistribute the game art, you can't run the game, as it depends on it. -
thelastproject (thelastproject)'s status on Monday, 25-Mar-2013 14:23:44 EDT
thelastproject
Last time I checked it was this way. Encouraging is great, but I think Debian punishes too much, as the art files are still usable and Free. -
cwebber (cwebber)'s status on Monday, 25-Mar-2013 14:23:28 EDT 
cwebber
License freeness/non-freeness is good; though plenty of liberated pixel cup sprites were edited pixel by pixel; it's more complex here -
cwebber (cwebber)'s status on Monday, 25-Mar-2013 14:20:13 EDT
cwebber
Is that true? I think encouraging "build from source media assets" is great and enforcing it is terrible.
All Hacker Poesy content and data are available under the