Notices tagged with freesoftware, page 36
-
lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Friday, 18-Jan-2013 10:14:44 EST lxoliva
@csolisr Freed-ora is just RPM packaging of GNU Linux-libre, which in turn is just a Linux source Free distro -
csolisr (csolisr)'s status on Friday, 18-Jan-2013 10:14:13 EST csolisr
@lxoliva #Trisquel and #Parabola ship IceCat/ABrowser/IceWeasel-Libre for all of the aforementioned reasons. -
lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Friday, 18-Jan-2013 10:13:26 EST lxoliva
@csolisr BLAG contains all of Freed-ora, so no. you seem to have got the idea (maybe from me?) that Freed-ora is more than a Linux distro -
lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Friday, 18-Jan-2013 10:11:04 EST lxoliva
@csolisr some people love to find reasons to smear us, and “forbidding installation of software” is a frequent misrepresentation -
lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Friday, 18-Jan-2013 10:09:40 EST lxoliva
@csolisr I think I know what you mean and if so I agree with it, but we have to be careful with our wording -
lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Friday, 18-Jan-2013 10:09:00 EST lxoliva
@csolisr ... (iv) and that any distro shipping Firefox ships non-Free Software -
lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Friday, 18-Jan-2013 10:08:21 EST lxoliva
@csolisr ... (iii) that Firefox is non-Free because it allows that ... -
lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Friday, 18-Jan-2013 10:08:05 EST lxoliva
@csolisr ... (ii) that allowing nonFS to be installed is a problem ... -
lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Friday, 18-Jan-2013 10:07:43 EST lxoliva
@csolisr several incorrect conclusions could be drawn from your statements: (i) that Freed-ora ships Firefox ... -
csolisr (csolisr)'s status on Friday, 18-Jan-2013 10:07:24 EST csolisr
@lxoliva At least we do agree that #BLAG is more freedom-compliant than Freedora, right? -
lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Friday, 18-Jan-2013 10:05:33 EST lxoliva
@csolisr I didn't say they didn't encourage them, just that the problem was not in the allowing their installation -
csolisr (csolisr)'s status on Friday, 18-Jan-2013 10:01:50 EST csolisr
@lxoliva They do encourage it. Haven't you seen Mozilla's list of "must-have" addons at their site? Many of them are non-free. -
lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Friday, 18-Jan-2013 09:59:25 EST lxoliva
@csolisr although Fedora's shipping Firefox fails the FSDG for that, that doesn't make Firefox non-Free Software -
lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Friday, 18-Jan-2013 09:59:06 EST lxoliva
@csolisr allowing is not the problem, encouraging is -
csolisr (csolisr)'s status on Friday, 18-Jan-2013 09:55:11 EST csolisr
@lxoliva There are programs with addon repositories that do allow installing non-free software, like Firefox. -
lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Friday, 18-Jan-2013 07:43:37 EST lxoliva
@csolisr plus, any non-free software in Fedora (aside from firmware double-think) would be a violation of their own policy; got evidence? -
lxoliva (lxoliva)'s status on Friday, 18-Jan-2013 07:39:35 EST lxoliva
@csolisr no, it doesn't include any such thing. Freed-ora is a libre distribution of Linux, not of GNU/Linux -
thelastproject (thelastproject)'s status on Thursday, 17-Jan-2013 14:57:52 EST thelastproject
I'm sure we all still respect him after this. He's a great man, and I feel honored to have learnt about !freesoftware due to him. -
guido (guido)'s status on Thursday, 17-Jan-2013 11:05:33 EST guido
"Verso una Scuola Open" conference about !fs in !education going on in Trento, #italy http://ur1.ca/cjwyl Is anybody there? -
DJ Dougernaut (douglasawh)'s status on Wednesday, 16-Jan-2013 17:31:25 EST DJ Dougernaut
Does anyone know anything about http://www.mirthcorp.com/community/source-code ? I just got asked about it by a "Health IT Analyst"