Notices tagged with activitypub, page 6
-
AndStatus (andstatus)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Oct-2017 20:27:05 EDT 
AndStatus
@mike@macgirvin.com What do you this is a better alternative to #ActivityPub? Or maybe something concrete could be changed in its current version to make it better? -
AndStatus (andstatus)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Oct-2017 19:27:05 EDT
AndStatus
@mike@macgirvin.com What do you this is a better alternative to #ActivityPub? Or maybe something concrete could be changed in its current version to make it better? -
AndStatus (andstatus)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Oct-2017 18:27:06 EDT
AndStatus
@mike@macgirvin.com What do you this is a better alternative to #ActivityPub? Or maybe something concrete could be changed in its current version to make it better? -
AndStatus (andstatus)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Oct-2017 17:27:31 EDT
AndStatus
@mike@macgirvin.com What do you this is a better alternative to #ActivityPub? Or maybe something concrete could be changed in its current version to make it better? -
AndStatus (andstatus)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Oct-2017 16:28:37 EDT
AndStatus
@mike@macgirvin.com What do you this is a better alternative to #ActivityPub? Or maybe something concrete could be changed in its current version to make it better? -
AndStatus (andstatus)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Oct-2017 15:29:41 EDT
AndStatus
@mike@macgirvin.com What do you this is a better alternative to #ActivityPub? Or maybe something concrete could be changed in its current version to make it better? -
AndStatus (andstatus)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Oct-2017 14:30:11 EDT
AndStatus
@mike@macgirvin.com What do you this is a better alternative to #ActivityPub? Or maybe something concrete could be changed in its current version to make it better? -
AndStatus (andstatus)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Oct-2017 13:53:44 EDT
AndStatus
@mike@macgirvin.com What do you this is a better alternative to #ActivityPub? Or maybe something concrete could be changed in its current version to make it better? -
Yuri Volkov (yvolk)'s status on Sunday, 01-Oct-2017 01:04:45 EDT 
Yuri Volkov
I filed a bug for #ActivityPub, which is exactly about Person's freedom to choose (and actually, change) an instance/server of a global social network without loosing his/her identity, including historical data. Moving from one instance of a federation to another is a normal case, just like having user accounts at several servers. And #ActivityPub specification should explici… -
Yuri Volkov (yvolk)'s status on Sunday, 01-Oct-2017 01:04:45 EDT
Yuri Volkov
I filed a bug for #ActivityPub, which is exactly about Person's freedom to choose (and actually, change) an instance/server of a global social network without loosing his/her identity, including historical data. Moving from one instance of a federation to another is a normal case, just like having user accounts at several servers. And #ActivityPub specification should explici… -
Yuri Volkov (yvolk)'s status on Friday, 29-Sep-2017 02:00:09 EDT
Yuri Volkov
@cwebber Reposting to make sure you received my reply. Where should I file this #ActivityPub issue? The #ActivityPub spec's problem is not in that simplistic phrase "users are represented as actors here". The problem is that there is NO technical description of the whole domain model layer: relation between Actors (e.g. Person) and Users of servers. Current version will be int… -
Yuri Volkov (yvolk)'s status on Friday, 29-Sep-2017 02:00:09 EDT
Yuri Volkov
@cwebber Reposting to make sure you received my reply. Where should I file this #ActivityPub issue? The #ActivityPub spec's problem is not in that simplistic phrase "users are represented as actors here". The problem is that there is NO technical description of the whole domain model layer: relation between Actors (e.g. Person) and Users of servers. Current version will be int… -
Yuri Volkov (yvolk)'s status on Thursday, 28-Sep-2017 02:10:33 EDT 
Yuri Volkov
@cwebber The #ActivityPub spec's problem is not in that simplistic phrase "users are represented as actors here".
The problem is that there is NO technical description of the whole domain model layer: relation between Actors (e.g. Person) and Users of servers. Current version will be interpreted as having one-to-one relation between the two _different_ kinds of entities, and that _is_ incorrect
?! -
Yuri Volkov (yvolk)'s status on Thursday, 28-Sep-2017 02:10:33 EDT
Yuri Volkov
@cwebber The #ActivityPub spec's problem is not in that simplistic phrase "users are represented as actors here".
The problem is that there is NO technical description of the whole domain model layer: relation between Actors (e.g. Person) and Users of servers. Current version will be interpreted as having one-to-one relation between the two _different_ kinds of entities, and that _is_ incorrect
?! -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Monday, 11-Sep-2017 04:50:08 EDT 
MMN-o ✅⃠
@oxenfree @cybermeow @elizafox @cyberpotato @cajun @thatbrickster @lain @heluecht Hi, I'm @mmn, maintainer of GNUsocial. I reacted when it was written that "many people on gnusocial are angry" and wish to say that !GNUsocial has only love and appreciation for #Mastodon and #ActivityPub. I believe cooperation is important for libre software and the federated social web… -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 18:40:10 EDT
MMN-o ✅⃠
@cwebber Indeed you and others involved with AP spec development have been very inclusive, inviting and encouraging. I very much appreciate your (and everyone else's) efforts that have been put into #ActivityPub. -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 18:37:58 EDT
MMN-o ✅⃠
@cwebber The only reason !GNUsocial doesn't have #ActivityPub yet is because I have a fulltime job and noone else has been up for the task .] Though I'm pretty sure it'd still just be the 100% public parts of AP that would be used/promoted, as I'm pretty much convinced there's no such thing as privacy in the social sphere anyway and anyone using "private" communicatio… -
Charles Hutchins (celesteh)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2017 13:48:56 EDT 
Charles Hutchins
Are there plans for !gnusocial to add the new #ActivityPub protocol? -
Former Bob Jonkman -- Please use the new server at https://gs.jonkman.ca (bobjonkmanformer)'s status on Tuesday, 04-Jul-2017 21:58:46 EDT 
Former Bob Jonkman -- Please use the new server at https://gs.jonkman.ca
I'm perfectly happy that #Mastodon exists, and if it implements #ActivityPub in a future version, more power to it. And if it drops #OStatus support, well, that's what forks (or reimplementations) like #Mastodon are for. But don't blame #GNUsocial developers for not following #Mastodon's road map for the future. -
AndStatus (andstatus)'s status on Monday, 22-May-2017 01:52:13 EDT
AndStatus
@deadsuperhero Inspiring news! Glad that I noticed them at least now :-) I didn't think #ActivityPub adoption campaign could be so active :-) Just this weekend I started to refactor internal data model of #AndStatus from "messages"/"users" with some "favorited", "followed" etc. attributes to "activities" with actors and actions... I'm trying to use terminology of ActivityPub…
All Hacker Poesy content and data are available under the