I think you are referring to this: https://www.infoq.com/news/2019/05/end-of-javax-package/

Ultimately, I think this quote sums it up if you want to look at it as a positive:
"Oracle contributed millions of lines of code in the reference implementations for Java EE, including GlassFish, Jersey, Grizzly, etc. Oracle contributed the Java EE TCK. This was a huge step for them, as it was highly confidential and proprietary until then. This was a very large asset, with millions of dollars in Java EE licensing revenue attached to it. Oracle is licensing their copyrights in all of the Java EE specifications. This includes all of the past work that happened at Sun and BEA, so it is a very large percentage of the overall content of the specifications."

I'm not convinced what Oracle did is any different than what Red Hat does. It's just more complicated because it's a language. And maybe that's a salient point. We don't treat pencils and nuclear bombs the same though they can both be weapons. Matters of degree matter.

Oracle gonna Oracle. I guess I'm just not going to waste cycles being upset about that, and I'm just focusing on the positive.

Fundamentally though, the doomsayers have been proven wrong about Java. Ultimately, that's my point.