I haven't read most of the Hunter Biden stories, because HB isn't running for President. If they can prove that HB had illegal materials (that is, child porn) on his laptop, then USDOJ should prosecute him, just as they'd prosecute anyone else.

I have said, and I repeat, that long before this material, based on the Ukraine and China interactions, if Joe Biden were a regular federal employee, he would have been fired and possibly prosecuted for perceived conflicts of interest. It is only because he was VP and a former member of Congress that he wasn't.

If your media outlet isn't saying this, they're dishonest and not trustworthy.

(It is weird, IMO, that only the likewise dishonest pro-Trump media seem to talk about these things, and they talk mainly about some imaginary quid-pro-quo that is unlikely to ever be proven. There's a reason that government conflict-of-interest laws and rules forbid even the appearance of corruption. An honest press could admit that there are things in their desired candidate's history that are unsavory or even possibly illegal.)