laurelrusswurm on identi.ca

This remote profile is registered on another site; see laurelrusswurm's original profile page on identi.ca.

1. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 08-Dec-2012 17:12:43 EST laurelrusswurm

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink When going after O'Dwyer they were also claiming .org and others. What they lay claim to always expands, like !copyright
2. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 08-Dec-2012 17:07:22 EST laurelrusswurm

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink perhaps it is part of the modern !copyright chilling effect if there is no copying in the schools you've attended...
3. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 08-Dec-2012 17:02:30 EST laurelrusswurm

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink American !copyright law takes jurisdiction over .com domains, so what Nederlands law says about online copyright doesn't apply
4. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 08-Dec-2012 16:45:22 EST laurelrusswurm

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink That's semantics. Imitation *is* copying. Ask George Harrison... #mysweetlord !copyright
5. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 08-Dec-2012 16:28:19 EST laurelrusswurm

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink !Copyright law gives you the legal right to prevent others from creating. If copyright was abolished, you would not.
6. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 08-Dec-2012 16:22:54 EST laurelrusswurm

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink You may believe !copyright law there is not over-legalized at present, but even if that is true now, it will not be for long.
7. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 08-Dec-2012 16:19:53 EST laurelrusswurm

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink !Copyright laws are already going beyond physical copying. Which is pretty crazy since human beings learn by copying. !copyright
8. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 08-Dec-2012 15:59:00 EST laurelrusswurm

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink But art is not made in a vacuum. We are all influenced by the art we are exposed to, art that came before. !copyright
9. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 08-Dec-2012 15:48:39 EST laurelrusswurm

   Remote profile options...

   • marjoleink
   @marjoleink While you have the right to decide what to do with your work you should not have a right to dictate what I may create !copyright
10. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 08-Dec-2012 15:44:17 EST laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...

    • marjoleink
    @marjoleink While much current !copyright law agrees with your contention, allowing legal action against creators, I don't believe it right
11. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 08-Dec-2012 15:38:08 EST laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...

    • marjoleink
    @marjoleink We may have !copyright law that tells us we're not allowed to see the man behind the curtain but it is legal fiction nonetheless
12. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 08-Dec-2012 15:34:15 EST laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...

    • marjoleink
    @marjoleink the moment you show your work to me, it becomes part of my memory, and may influence how I see the world and create !copyright
13. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 08-Dec-2012 15:32:13 EST laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...

    • marjoleink
    @marjoleink The moment you take your creations out of your private domain and place it before the public it stops being simple. !copyright
14. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 08-Dec-2012 15:27:39 EST laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...

    • marjoleink
    @marjoleink You do have the right to decide what to do with your own creations. You can keep it private, retain total control. !copyright
15. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 08-Dec-2012 15:23:10 EST laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...

    • marjoleink
    @marjoleink this is where I must disagree, because !Copyright law is anything but simple.
16. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Saturday, 08-Dec-2012 15:01:53 EST laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...
    @Illusionofmore But the state does not intervene if someone infringes my !copyright because the wrong is subject to interpretation.
17. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Friday, 07-Dec-2012 13:14:04 EST laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...

    • marjoleink
    @marjoleink The point stands: most creators do not have lawyers on retainer; !copyright "Protection" is only through lawsuits.
18. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Friday, 07-Dec-2012 13:05:18 EST laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...
    @Illusionofmore Beyond frightening creators (due to fear of potential lawsuits) from drawing on popular culture (called !copyright chill)
19. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Friday, 07-Dec-2012 13:04:11 EST laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...
    @Illusionofmore What else does !copyright law do besides pursue a legal remedy for a infringement?
20. laurelrusswurm (laurelrusswurm)'s status on Friday, 07-Dec-2012 13:03:11 EST laurelrusswurm

    Remote profile options...
    @Illusionofmore First, !Copyright infringement isn't called theft in any statute/lawbook I've heard of, because it's NOT. It's infringement.

• After
• Before